In society, we don't punish someone that is earning too much money for their work. To downvote a "overrewarded" post is purely motivated by monetary understanding. My understanding for the downvote was to kind of inform the community of content that is not only harmful to others, but harmful to the platform and prevent it from being in plain view on frontend UI's like Steemit.com.

We need to care about the quality and not the quantity. The content and the content creators are in essence, "independent representatives" for the Steem blockhain. We have to care about the community that makes up the Steem blockchain and support content that will bring value not just today, but 10, 20, 100 years later where people will access content for information and knowledge. Having the corporate responsibility and understanding that corporate actions, decisions, behaviors, and impacts, are affected when those that are high up in the company lack the responsibility to even care about the content and the entire community and we see this.

Zing! Nice job!