Idolatry and Cults

in #religion7 years ago (edited)

Introduction

An idol is an object treated as a representative of a deity and used as an object of worship. Sometimes it is even treated as a literal manifestation of the deity. It may be a statue, a painting, or any other object of veneration.


Image credit

A cult is a bit harder to define, since the word is used to describe anything from a secretive and insular religious sect to the following of a pop culture phenomenon, but for my purposes I will use it in the sense of a subculture that engages in psychological manipulation of its members.

Hypothesis

It is my intention to suggest that many people hold beliefs that are more akin to idolatry and cultism than to rationally-explored principles. As an example, I present this image:

BURN DIFFERENCE.jpg
Made last year by the author from online images of unknown provenance

If you think there's a difference between the pieces of cloth, you might be an idolater in a cult. Is this too extreme? Well, let's explore the concept and see how accurate it is.

The Flag and Idolatry

A flag is just a symbol. It can be claimed to represent anything. Anyone can wave it. It has no inherent meaning. However, many people believe a flag represents their highest ideals. To them, the flag IS liberty, justice, family, and society. To harm the flag is to attack their core beliefs. If that is not idolatry, what is it? After all, if the flag represents liberty, how is the principle harmed by its exercise in handling an instance of its symbol you happen to own? But the flag idolater would trample the principle for the sake of the symbol.

National flags are always defined under government law as a symbol for government, so it would be accurate to say that a flag represents a government. However, do governments represent the people they govern, or are nations akin to cults?

Nationalism and Cultishness

The Cult Education Institute is an organization with an admittedly dubious reputation, but the following ten warning signs of a potential cult seem like a reasonable benchmark nonetheless:

  1. Absolute authoritarianism without meaningful accountability.
  2. No tolerance for questions or critical inquiry.
  3. No meaningful financial disclosure regarding budget, expenses such as an independently audited financial statement.
  4. Unreasonable fear about the outside world, such as impending catastrophe, evil conspiracies and persecutions.
  5. There is no legitimate reason to leave, former followers are always wrong in leaving, negative or even evil.
  6. Former members often relate the same stories of abuse and reflect a similar pattern of grievances.
  7. There are records, books, news articles, or television programs that document the abuses of the group/leader.
  8. Followers feel they can never be "good enough".
  9. The group/leader is always right.
  10. The group/leader is the exclusive means of knowing "truth" or receiving validation, no other process of discovery is really acceptable or credible.

How does government (any government) fare? Every government throughout history fits the vast majority of these warning indications, and most are a perfect fit for all 10 to one degree or another.

  1. Governments demand absolute authority without any real oversight or accountability.
  2. Despite frequent lip service to intellectual freedom, inquiry into the philosophical foundation of governmental authority is typically not tolerated.
  3. Governmental accounting is notoriously convoluted and hard to audit honestly.
  4. Foreign threats are always said to be looming without the protection of the government.
  5. Expatriates are often frowned upon as disloyal or worse.
  6. Expatriates often cite similar reasons for departure from their former countries
  7. History is quite clear on the destructive acts of governments against foreign and domestic targets.
  8. Citizens are often bombarded with exhortations to be better.
  9. Governments always strive to present themselves as bastions of virtue and justice whole demonizing those who might oppose their policies.
  10. Every government claims to be the best, and encourages their citizens to view other countries as backwards.

Representation

Lysander Spooner covered this matter in extreme detail when he wrote A Letter to Grover Cleveland, which was published in 1886. An excerpt is included below:

These voters, having given their votes in secret have put it out of your power to designate your principals individually. You have no legal knowledge as to who voted for you. And being unable to designate your principals individually, you have no right to say that you have any principals. And having no right to say that you have any principals, you are mere usurpers, making laws and enforcing them upon your own authority alone.

A secret ballot makes a secret government; and a secret government is nothing else than a government by conspiracy. And a government by conspiracy is the only government we now have.

You say that "every voter exercises a public trust."

Who appointed him to that trust? Nobody. He simply usurped the power; he never accepted the trust. And because he usurped the power, he dares exercise it only in secret. Not one of all the voters who helped to place you in power would have dared to do so if he had known that he was to be held personally responsible for the acts of those for whom he voted.

Inasmuch as all the votes, given for you and your lawmakers, were given in secret, all that you and they can say, in support of your authority as rulers, is that you venture upon your acts as lawmakers, etc., not because you have any open, authentic, written, legitimate authority granted you by any human being,—for you can show nothing of the kind,—but only because, from certain reports made to you of votes given in secret, you have reason to believe that you have at your backs a secret association strong enough to sustain you by force, in case your authority should be resisted.

Is there a government on earth that rests upon a more false, absurd, or tyrannical basis than that?


Image credit

Conclusion

Whether you are religious or atheist, an honest examination of the issue must at least raise the possibility that veneration of the flag is idolatry, support for government is cultish, and representation is a lie used to perpetrate fraud.


If you like this post, please comment, follow, and resteem!

coins_small.jpg

Sort:  

Just reading this after writing my post "Standing (or not) For The Flag" and It makes me realize how restrained and... kind you were in your comments to me. Your article surely makes one realize the irony of defending a flag against others' "acts of freedom", that it is supposed to stand for. Thanks for getting the brain going, jacobtothe.

I may be an anarchist, but I remember how I felt when I was a flag-waving patriot. I wasn't persuaded to reconsider by name-calling. It was people who poked my core beliefs with new reasoning that made me question how solid they were.

The very fact that people refer to the destruction of a flag as desecration is all the evidence I need that it is an idol in many peoples lives.

The sky cloth worship in the U.S. runs deep.

These fools are so caught up in *symbols of freedom * they've lost all sight of any issues of actual freedom. image

I agree with a lot of your post, I wish people would step back ad think in this way instead of being instantly offended and it immediately kills and type of dialect.
just crazy to think this a difficult subject to talk about, either burning the flag to standing at the national anthem

Great post and very informative. @jacobtothe Have learnt a lot from it.

Unlike the other generic commenter, you have upvoted this post, so I thank you for that, but please leave something specific in the comment so I know you actually read it. You are being flagged by @cheetah, so I have to assume you have been doing this for a while now. You're killing your own reputation this way.

Idolotry is the worst because it opens everything up to be acceptable. The worst idol that is worshipped is MONEY

Money isn't usually an idol IMHO. Money is often demonized as a destructive force that turns people into monsters, but money doesn't really make people do anything. It's just a tool. How people use a tool reveals something about the person, not something about the tool.

See also: pen, rifle, computer, automobile, kitchen knife, etc.

Now, when money is used to buy political power, the people using the money are definitely evil.

people worship money. They chase money, they do terrible things for money. In terms of it being a tool; I agree, but tools can be worshipped.

Seeking to acquire money is not evidence for worship. People typically want money not for its own sake, but for what it can be used to do.

Some people want to use money to better their own lives, and there is nothing inherently idolatrous with that. Others want to use money as a means to coerce others, especially through politics, That is evil, but not idolatry.

Look past the money to examine the purpose behind the humans acting.

Oh don't get me wrong; I'm not a communist or anything like that. Money should be neutral. What I am saying is that it is not the end all for things; but some make it just that. That is where I am drawing the distinction. Yes we chase certain things including money. I do feel that some actually worship it (sacrificing morals for it) in order to acquire it.

Thank you very much for sharing inspiring content.

Then please upvote it and leave something more than a generic comment. Otherwise, you're just a spammer trying to get upvotes by commenting, and possibly just a bot account. Your reputation is falling because you are adding nothing to the community except spam.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.12
JST 0.028
BTC 65160.59
ETH 3545.92
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.43