One instance rates to "it was debunked many times".
the 6% figure has been debunked many times. It was actually only ever 0.6% but the original post that got everyone so riled up fudged the numbers. Watch out for who you trust.
Really, why does that post above, where haijin made about half of what he did when he was making 80k a week, is 4 times more than your claim that it was only ever 0.06% you liar asshole that thinks trolling is calling bullshit out, be it lies or unfounded and doubious claims that offfer no proof of what they purpout.
It's a typo you dimwitted dullingotn. You see where I said that the post above is 4 times more than what you claimed it was only ever? Meaning 2.4%. Who's spreading lies you faggot?
So those seemingly random groups of words and phrases were supposed to actually mean something? Learn to form coherent sentences. Also, learn a little maths. You won't look like such a fucking dum dum next time.
You understood enough to dispute a typo even though the math couldn't be more basic, somehow you think that your comment will convince anyone you're not a scumbag liar because obviously you linked a post showing 4x what you claimed it was ever at, but you never said %0.06. Yeah lol, you didn't but the post still shows you lied, was it only ever %0.6 or 0.7 or what you linked you idiot, not to mention that week he mad half of what he made when he was cashing out 80k a week. Dullington.
the 6% figure has been debunked many times. It was actually only ever 0.6% but the original post that got everyone so riled up fudged the numbers. Watch out for who you trust.
The lie detector test determined that was a lie!
I said 0.7%
And the lie detector test determined you lied AGAIN.
It was a Rhetorical you dillweed. You lied and said "It was actually only ever 0.6%". What a bullshit because we know this from your own article:
So I did the math..
$46,960 divided by $2,147,847 = .021863 or 2.1863%
And the intereting part is that during that week he was making 49k, there were weeks he was making o ver 80k. Debating these things with someone who lies like this and doesn't cough up proof of their claims but proof of their own lies is a waste of time.. you BELIEVE what you want to believe, and trust who you want.
the 6% figure has been debunked many times. It was actually only ever 0.6% but the original post that got everyone so riled up fudged the numbers. Watch out for who you trust.
One instance rates to "it was debunked many times".
Really, why does that post above, where haijin made about half of what he did when he was making 80k a week, is 4 times more than your claim that it was only ever 0.06% you liar asshole that thinks trolling is calling bullshit out, be it lies or unfounded and doubious claims that offfer no proof of what they purpout.
I never said 0.06%, idiot. I said 0.7%. Stop spreading lies.
It's a typo you dimwitted dullingotn. You see where I said that the post above is 4 times more than what you claimed it was only ever? Meaning 2.4%. Who's spreading lies you faggot?
So those seemingly random groups of words and phrases were supposed to actually mean something? Learn to form coherent sentences. Also, learn a little maths. You won't look like such a fucking dum dum next time.
You understood enough to dispute a typo even though the math couldn't be more basic, somehow you think that your comment will convince anyone you're not a scumbag liar because obviously you linked a post showing 4x what you claimed it was ever at, but you never said %0.06. Yeah lol, you didn't but the post still shows you lied, was it only ever %0.6 or 0.7 or what you linked you idiot, not to mention that week he mad half of what he made when he was cashing out 80k a week. Dullington.
And the lie detector test determined you lied AGAIN.
I'm not a liar, you're a liar. What a fucking moron.
Tell me again how it's been debunked many times as well
There has been plenty of discussion on this issue. Sorry you missed it, and sorry you're still wrong. The image says it all. 0.7%
Yeah it does:
Where's your disparaging figure? 0.6%? 0.7%? Where did you pull that out of: only ever.
It's literally right there in the picture, near the bottom. Maybe turn on accessibility features if you're blind.
You are NOT the Censor Master of Steemit! Downvoted in disagreement!
It was a Rhetorical you dillweed. You lied and said "It was actually only ever 0.6%". What a bullshit because we know this from your own article:
And the intereting part is that during that week he was making 49k, there were weeks he was making o ver 80k. Debating these things with someone who lies like this and doesn't cough up proof of their claims but proof of their own lies is a waste of time.. you BELIEVE what you want to believe, and trust who you want.
The lie detector test determined that was a lie!