Major point of the article was that this is not a legitimate public sentiment, this is coming from the people Wikileaks exposes, their immediate friends, their sock puppet accounts, and then an incredibly small smattering of people who have been duped. Even those people - like the anon in the article - (assuming the anonymous account mentioned in the article is not a sock puppet act) - are usually liked/supported/RT'd by the same elite.

Eg: that anon was "liked" by Claude Taylor, a Clinton operative, who is paired with Louise Mensch even by "liberal" media. Mensch also attacked Christine. So again the overall impression is that there is almost nil organic feeling behind these attacks.