Sunday Ramble: Different Backgrounds... Leading to Different StoriessteemCreated with Sketch.

in #reality5 years ago

As some of you may know (or remember), I am sort of in the process of "reinventing myself" for the Nth time in my 58 years on this planet.

As Mrs. Denmarkguy and I phase out of being "shopkeepers" at our little gallery/giftshop in our local downtown area, I am slowly returning to one of my previous haunts: Being an editor and proofreader.

I have had some concerns about this, wondering whether it was yet another field to be eaten by automation, but so far it doesn't seem like AI is quite able to interpret what sets "compelling" writing aside from merely "technically correct" writing.

But I Digress...

0976Silhouettes.jpg
Silhouettes at the Golden Hour

Our Backgrounds Shape Our Lenses of Perception

The latest box to arrive in the mail — Yes, I still edit "on paper" rather than "on screen" — contained the manuscript of a friend who has been working on his "Opus Magnum" of writing for some years... and after about 25 false starts finally declared it "done."

Mrs. Denmarkguy and I each have a copy of the manuscript for review... you see, she's also a former magazine editor and publisher, as well as an accomplished writer.

What's the point here?

Our friend is a former baptist preacher turned cynic, and his manuscript is an exploration of the fallacies of organized religion (as seen from the inside) as it exists as an entity separately from individual people's relationships with God and spirituality.

Yeah, I know, that might sound a bit heavy.

Back to the lenses of perception, though.

0976White.jpg
Flowering tree in our garden...

We both have copies, because Mrs. Denmarkguy is an ordained minister and theologian with a degree in theology, while I am almost exactly the opposite.

As editors of a book that's expected to go in front of a very broad spectrum of the public, our editing opinions are differently — yet equally — valuable and important.

Growing Up With "The Absence Of"

People have often tried to pin me down on my beliefs and spiritual leanings, generally with very little success.

I was born in Denmark, to parents and an extended family for whom religion and God was a "non-issue."

What I mean by that is that we were technically Lutheran, but that didn't really mean much of anything. When you are a Danish citizen, unless you tell someone otherwise, you are "presumed Lutheran."

My parents were neither religious, nor spiritual in any way... on the other hand, they were also neither actively Agnostic or Atheist. I grew up with the basic experience that the entire issue of religion, God and/or rejection of same and everything related was simply "not particularly interesting."

0976Beach.jpg
The beach, near our house...

I suppose you could call my family "Functionalists" (if they were -ists, of ANY kind) in the sense that if something didn't (for example) make your cereal taste better or fuel your car, why would you waste time on it?

Certainly, I knew what "God" and "Christianity" were, just as I knew what "Buddhism", "Judaism" and "Islam" were... because having that knowledge (from a purely informational standpoint) was part of being a well-educated and well-rounded human being.

We did go to church on Christmas Eve because it seemed festive, and there were pretty lights and beautiful singing and so on... and somehow it seemed "a right thing to do" to go to church since we were essentially participating in a holiday that celebrated a core figure of Christianity.

Other than that, church seemed to be a place you might go for Christenings, weddings and funerals.

And so, that's the background I bring to my end of editing the above-mentioned manuscript.

0976Rhodies.jpg
Pink rhododendrons in bloom

On Being a Good Person...

I have been asked on many occasions how I can possibly pretend to know what it means to be a "good person," absent the core teachings of a religion.

Whereas religion itself has never been of that much interest to me, that particular question HAS because of its deeper implication that a person's "goodness" is a taught attribute rather than an inherent one.

I have come across many people in my lifetime who confessed to me something along the lines of "Without the fear of God and my religion, I would most likely be a horrible person..."

I'm usually not scared by much, but that particular line of thinking actually frightens me. If all that separates someone from running amok and causing mayhem and destruction is their belief in/fear of "Something Greater Than Themselves" what does that really say about their essential selves?

Is there really just a paper thin line that separates civilization from savagery?

0976Ducks.jpg
Ducks on the bay...

The discussions are often interesting — at least as long as they don't descend into the other person feeling the compulsion to proselytize — and typically end up at "But you have to believe in SOMEthing... don't you?"

Of course, that can result in some very long philosophical answers, which is an entire post onto itself... which I might explore, someday. However, the very short version of what I "believe in" is (to neatly close this little circle!) something Mrs. Denmarkguy often tells her therapy clients:

Don't be Shitty!

Maybe that seems overly simplistic, and I'm sure there are plenty of skeptics ready to dissect it — perhaps for little more reason than they like to argue — but it summarizes what I tend to feel guided by.

Thanks for reading!

Comments, feedback and other interaction is invited and welcomed! Because — after all — SOCIAL content is about interacting, right? Leave a comment-- share your experiences-- be part of the conversation!

PHC Logo

(As usual, all text and images by the author, unless otherwise credited. This is original content, created expressly for Steemit)
Created at 190414 22:58 PST

0976

Sort:  

I share your thoughts on religion and 'goodness'. I have a similar motto, 'don't be an arse' being the more publication friendly version of it!

I also find it weird that some consider morality to be inherent in a book that is at best an imprecise transcript (being made by men) of morality that, unless you are being literal in interpreting, is also a bit of a pick and choose between what parts of the morality that you want to adopt. In that case, what is informing the ability to choose which parts you like and which bits you don't? Experience? An authority figure?

I believe a lot of these were "stories of wisdom" that were passed along in the oral tradition of story telling, before they were written into a book... that is basically a collection of books.

In many ways, I am rather of the same belief as the late comedian George Carlin: "Six billion people on earth? There should be six billion religions."

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

your photo are good for blogging. 😊👊👊👊


We are SO proud to have you as a member of our
FANTABULOUS Power House Creatives family!
uvoted and/or resteemed!

❤ MWAH!!! ❤

Power House Creatives Logos FINAL_float.png

#powerhousecreatives

Posted using Partiko Android

We were brought up to respect everyone equally, treat others the way your would like to be treated. Home was neither for nor against any religion, some went to church, other family members didn't, we all had freedom of choice.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 61940.19
ETH 2433.78
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.50