You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: A Few Words on Mainstream Media Double-Standards (and what's behind it all...)
What do you think of them showing the drowned refugee child on the front page while never showing the dead children from Islamic truck attacks?
I think using dead or wounded children for propagandistic purposes is terrible, no matter who does it.
I think the worldwide exposition of a dead child picture (refugee or not) is never an accident, there's an agenda behind and those who promote it know how to affect people by using children.
Maybe the agenda could be to promote acceptance for refugees in European countries, but even as they show the world how these refugees are victimized by war and different conflicts, msm won't tell us what's behind those same conflicts, the information shared is always superficial and seeks a specific purpose of causing certain emotions, they are not an invitation to reason or reflection.
But why wouldn't they show the victims of Islamic-oriented terrorists? If they need support for intervention in areas held by ismalic terrorism, or more surveillance at home, they will show everything they have at hand to arouse public opinion to support military invasion and more surveillance.
If they want to topple Assad they show the drowned boy and say he is a victim of that tyranny... If they need cheaper workers in Europe then they will send them from the Middle East and tell people to support immigration. I'm speculating... what do you think?
My answer is going to make a good post I'll get back to you.
https://steemit.com/informationwar/@openparadigm/denial-deceit-and-delusion