A recent article by@homerus spoke about the mainstream media ignoring the terror attacks perpetrated in third world countries, as a response I asked him about the downplaying of details of terror attacks committed in western countries.

Such as....

The atrocities inside the Bataclan concert hall

Trying to obscure the religious identities of attackers

Showing fake peace protests with paid Muslim actors manufacturing Muslim opposition to terror attacks carried out with Islamic justifications.

The showing of the dead refugee child who drowned while hiding the children killed in Islamic truck attacks.

@homerus talked about how terror attacks in the west are used to go to war, but the most startling thing to me is how every possible excuse is trotted out to defend the ideology used as a justification for the attacks by the attackers.
The crowning glory of this is George W Bush and his pronouncement that Islam is a religion of Peace.
I always get a good laugh when a progressive use's this quote and I tell them the source of the quote.
Peace? Perhaps a peace comparable to the Pax Romanica.

To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire[religion]; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.

Tacitus

A better description of the ideology of Islam is a religion of conquest, with a long and ongoing history of conquest and domination.
Much is made of the poverty that drives people to commit terror attacks or foreign invasion and past exploitation.
Why all this hand wringing over the perpetrators disadvantages?
This happens in the case of all crime's committed by visible minorities and followers of Islam.
Colin Flaherty documents how violent racist attacks are downplayed with details suppressed if the perpetrators are black people. He documents this week after week, he's wrote books about it . He has challenged anyone to show video footage (a comparable amount) of black people being violently assaulted by white people. No takers so far.

Daily Caller: “As the brutal “knockout” game sweeps across the U.S., one author isn’t surprised by the attacks or the media reaction. Colin Flaherty, author of the book “White Girl Bleed A Lot: The Return of Racial Violence to America and How The Media Ignore It,” began chronicling the new wave of violence nearly a year ago — revealing disturbing racial motivations behind the attacks and a pattern of media denial.”

pic credit

Why is this done?
Here is a quote From blogger Eric Raymond that really lays it out.

Press silence, black privilege, and unintended consequences

http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=6286

Eric Raymond

No conspiracy theory is required to explain the silence here. Reporters and editors are nervous about being thought racist, or (worse) having “anti-racist” pressure groups demonstrating on their doorsteps. The easy route to avoiding this is a bit of suppressio veri – not lying, exactly, but not uttering facts that might be thought racially inflammatory.
The pattern of suppression is neatly explained by the following premises: Any association of black people with criminality is inflammatory. Any suggestion that black criminals are motivated by racism to prey on white victims is super-inflammatory. And above all, we must not inflame. Better to be silent.

This is the same reason that the culpability of Islam for the terror attacks committed in the name of Islam is downplayed here is a quote detailing the EU's attempts at downplaying the Islamic role in terror attacks.

FREE SPEECH CRACKDOWN: British press told NOT to reveal if terrorists are Muslims

European Council has said the British press should not reports when terrorists are Muslims in a slew of request to the Government to crack down on the media.

In the 83-page report, the Commission said: “ECRI considers that, in light of the fact that Muslims are increasingly under the spotlight as a result of recent ISIS-related terrorist acts around the world, fuelling prejudice against Muslims shows a reckless disregard, not only for the dignity of the great majority of Muslims in the United Kingdom, but also for their safety.

“In this context, it draws attention to a recent study by Teeside University suggesting that where the media stress the Muslim background of perpetrators of terrorist acts, and devote significant coverage to it, the violent backlash against Muslims is likely to be greater than in cases where the perpetrators’ motivation is downplayed or rejected in favour of alternative explanations.”

ECRI is a human rights body of the Council of Europe, composed of independent experts, which monitors problems of racism, xenophobia, antisemitism, intolerance and racial discrimination.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/717627/free-speech-crackdown-EU-report-British-press-hate-crime-violence-terror

Meanwhile when people put up posters that say

It's Okay to Be White

Everyone goes crazy and calls it racism!

Why is it Not Okay to be White?
Aydin Paladin

While ignoring the daily racist violence documented by Colin Flaherty or the racist attacks perpetrated by Arab supremacists in the name of Islam.
Why do I call Islamic attacks racist?
Because "Subhuman Rhymes with Infidel" as Francisco Gil-White explains in his article. All all you need to do is look at the history of various Islamic Empires .
The treatment of the black people of Africa how they're very word for black person Abeed, means slave.
Their capture of Europeans as slaves up to the 1800's.
Even up to the present the ethnic cleansing in Sudan by the northern "Arab's" against the southern black population.
Looking there you will find all the evidence you need of a racial and cultural supremacy that replaces the language and way of life of all it conquers.
When a white person points out and protests actual crimes committed by rape gangs targeting underage white girls he is labelled a racist just because the criminals commiting these crimes were predominantly Muslim. Like the case of Tommy Robinson.

In conclusion I would say that whether it's Islamic attacks or racist attacks against white people what we will see in the media is Denial, Deceit and Delusion as Colin Flaherty repeats often enough.
The Denial we will see will be just like the mass sexual assaults in Cologne where first the authorities denied anything even happened second they blamed German men and when the ethnicity of the criminals could no longer be denied they had to stress that they weren't refugees.
The Deceit we will see will be just like when CNN published a list of terror attacks around the world and somehow forgot to include the terror attacks within Israel(kind of destroys the narrative that of pro-israel bias in the American establishment)

Ignoring Victims Why?

CNN published the list on Friday in response to the truck attack in Nice on Thursday night that left 84 people dead and hundreds injured. The article included mention of major terror incidents around the world that took place from June 14 through July 14. The list included incidents in Iraq, Bangladesh, Texas, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Somalia, Florida and France.

The list, however, fails to include mention of a single terror attack that took place in Israel during the same period. Among those attacks was the brutal slaying of 13-year-old Hallel Yaffa Ariel who was stabbed to death in her bed by a Palestinian terrorist on June 30.

The Delusion we will see will be just like everytime we are attacked and the first thing we do is worry about a "backlash". Deluded into thinking that if we just virtue signal hard enough all the people who hate us will realize how woke we are and forgive us for the sins of our forebears( Like everyone else's forebears aren't weighed down with blood soaked deeds).
When all that "virtue" signaling accomplishes is to let our enemies know that no matter what indignities they heap upon us be it rape, murder, torture or enslavement of our children we will roll over and present our asses for more.

Why is this done was the question, I would say this is part of a concerted program of destabilization.
Who is responsible for this destruction of our societies?

Post-modern Marxists