You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: PopularScience: Topology - What is It? Balls, Bagels and Loops...
@onesunbeingnow very interesting point of view!) I understand that math can be not interesting for you... But to deny the information as a whole - very strong.
I don't deny information, I just accept that it is just information, matter that has not taken form yet, so I can pick and choose whether I care about it or not. I only care about some basic information that is required to keep me at a high level of joy and fun. If it gets too complex the joy and fun have to be sacrificed for some perceived future gain. What is really happening here is that one shuts everything else and focuses really hard to see the hologram change before oneself into what one wants to see.
this is an effective way to have a nice dream but it isn't a practical way of doing something productive. maybe sometimes it is productive to have a nice dream, but not always. most of the time, actually, you have to do something productive, even if it's just alleiviating discomforts your body goes through on a regular basis, the urge to wee, the urge to take a dump, the urge to fuck, and the urge to eat. in between that, somewhere the food has to find a way into the mouth and it won't do it by itself, you are the only person who cares about it, as much as you do, and if you didn't, then why would anyone else care either?
dreaming is to think my imagination is real
In science, what is assumed to be the theory of today may be an approximation of the theory of tomorrow. Knowledge is not static. It evolves with time and postulates may change over time.
One thing however, science is not a matter of beliefs. We have facts, proofs, predictions, assumptions, etc. Now, if one does not accept proofs, it is another issue (and I am wondering what would be wrong with a proof not to accept it).
I nevertheless strongly agree with you on one point: it is always good to ask ourselves questions. :)
[ I know I already said that in other posts. ]
Knowledge ceases as soon as it is not on my mind. It does not exist if I do not give it attention.
My proof is my experience, and my level of experience is higher than mere words. Words, thoughts etc don't validate my experience, experience allows words to think as though they provide something called 'validation'. When really all they do is invalidate my experience by adding useless nonsense to the raw intensity of a direct experience. Direct personal experience is what matters, is what is true, and words come after the fact to label things as this or that, when its just light.
To be honest, the question/answer loop is for slaves who like staying trapped.