Democracy=military ran government ergo the term "commander in chief" but I'm sure you already know that ;-) lol. Now, I lean towards anarchy but it does not mean I believe true anarchy can ever succeed or at least not if we want the most progressive society. It would hinder the growth of the human race as a whole, if there were no agencies governing certain areas of the economy then every single person would have to have a profound understanding of contract law. That alone I find would be a massive waste of resources and time, if even possible. So I'm not totally against having some form or even multiple competing forms of government all trying to provide the best service for the citizens who chose to contract with said entity, but that is definitely not what we have today.
I guess I'd just like to see true capitalism not this monopolistic bullshit we have today...
Anarchy and democracy are nearly synonyms. A military dictatorship is certainly far from either.
You don't feel the current governments have a military style feel to them?
Oh, I certainly do. But they are far from democratic!
Absolutely. The internet is a profound democratizing force. And we need to fight like hell to keep it free and open, because losing it will be devastating.
Hillary Clinton has been an opponent of net neutrality for years, and if she is elected we may very well be playing defense for 8 years just to keep what we have.
Touché I should have clarified, I also don't see why a true democracy can't exist today with the internet and such. Seems the current political system is outdated to me.
from bacchist
bacchist · 3 minutes ago Absolutely. The internet is a profound democratizing force. And we need to fight like hell to keep it free and open, because losing it will be devastating. Hillary Clinton has been an opponent of net neutrality for years, and if she is elected we may very well be playing defense for 8 years just to keep what we have.
Hillary has a history of being a proponent of net neutrality.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/2/24/8104749/hillary-clinton-fcc-net-neutrality-plan-support
http://thehill.com/policy/technology/257569-clinton-touts-net-neutrality-and-city-owned-internet
Better examine the intent of "net neutrality".
I have the feeling it is about as accurate a description as "affordable healthcare"
Isn't that an oxymoron, enforcing rules on net neutrality? How can the Internet be a neutral place if there's rules that are enforced when someone breaks what someone else has deemed "wrong"?
I'm not wasting my time arguing about Hillary Clinton. Sorry. Even when her rhetoric matches what we want to hear, she is absolutely untrustworthy and beholden to her corporate masters. She now claims to oppose the TPP, which is the most immanent threat to a free and open internet... Yet as Secretary of State, she called it "the gold standard" of trade deals. She is a snake, and I've already wasted as much time on her as I care to.
I agree with you 100% no argument here... For the record I don't support Trump either. But then the person I posses resides in Canada so... I don't have to, it is a little scary watching the American election process unfold though.