Sort:  

Yes they should. The asylum seekers shouldn't have been there in the first place. Read my blog. You are misinformed.

I just think that that money could have been better spent on things like a new hospital, new schools or even donated to charity.

You do know the government has been paying Serco $400 000 a year, per asylum seeker, to illegally keep these innocent people as political prisoners right?
Add that up. See how many hospitals could have been built.

Hospitals that the asylum seekers and refugees have a legal right to, but are denied access to, in the effort to force them to be refouled. Which is illegal. A political stunt which has been paid for in innocent human lives.

So your not denying that the money could have been better spent?

Also where are these refugees come from?

Of course! We have been saying for years that the illegal system of keeping political prisoners is wasting billions of dollars of, and defrauding, the Australian taxpayers.
Most of the political prisoners are escaping death, torture and, ironically, political persecution from certain human rights ignoring countries in Africa and the Middle East. I would not like to comment on which ones, as I don't want to vilify any good people from those countries, that would be the pot calling the kettle black, but you can Google it easily enough.

And they don't have to. They have agreed to because they know they are in deep shit over their criminal activities if they don't. Being a bigot doesn't give anyone the right to violate another human's rights, regardless of what you believe.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.13
JST 0.027
BTC 60291.00
ETH 2583.81
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.55