Repeal the Second Amendment or Don't...Whatever
Having a ‘right’, also generally implies the legitimacy of the use of force if necessary to respond to a violation. So, a person… with the ‘right to life’ that is attacked… is justified in using necessary force in response to that attack." -Ben Doolin at abolishgovernmentnow.com
The 2nd Amendment to the u.s constitution is nothing more than words on [1]paper. It is [2]partially a statement of fact, no different than "water is wet". It guarantees nothing, nor does it need to. Rights, natural rights are not debatable. One's "right" to self defense cannot be given.. or.. taken away.
If by some horrible accident (think scary thoughts) all copies of the bill of rights were destroyed, would you then think "Well I guess all those rights are gone now". Of course not. Then why would you think the same if the 2nd Amendment were to ever be repealed. Rights don't magically disappear because a group of people in DC "decide" they do.
Believing that a "right" is only established because someone wrote it down is no more sane than believing a "wish" will only come true so long as you don't tell anyone about it after blowing out the candles on a birthday cake.
In 2013, Bill Buppert wrote an extremely thought provoking article entitled "Repeal the Second Amendment". Where he states...
"I am calling for repeal because I think every gun law on the books is wrong without exception and they all need to be eliminated so this appeal is rather lonesome and hails from an individualist perspective that is skeptical of all state power.... A movement to repeal would reset the entire conversation, bring honesty to the dialog since the stark reality of absolute disarmament would be imminent and possibly lead to revolutionary arborists tending the Tree of Liberty." - Bill Buppert
[1]Yes I'm aware that "paper" and "parchment" are different things.
[2]"A well regulated [3]Militia, being necessary to the security of a [4]free State....
[3]mi·li·tia
- a military force that is raised from the civil population to supplement a regular army in an emergency.
- A. a military force that engages in rebel or terrorist activities, typically in opposition to a regular army.
- B. all able-bodied civilians eligible by law for military service.
[4]The term "free state" is an oxymoron. See @larkenrose for reference.