People trust scientists to tell them how the world works (they want to be told) so when people like Darwin told people that everything could be explained by random mutation and chance and the idea of a creator or god was unscientific, it naturally led to people being able to justify behaviour that would once have been frowned upon, to be accepted. Eugenics is a natural progression from evolution that is completely incompatible with the majority of people's worldview prior to evolution when people had faith in God over science.

I'm not saying this is neccessarily a bad thing and it wouldn't be unless you believe as I do, that science has been taken over and is used as a propaganda tool.

It's used to keep us contained. To ensure we stop thinking about things that cannot be proven by science such as reincarnation, the existence of a soul or the idea that 'good' and 'evil' are real and not just words that make people think of a man with a beard in the sky or a red man with a fork living underground.

If you disagree with how much man has contributed to climate change you are a 'science denier'. If you ask questions about evolution you are a 'religious idiot' or someone who doesn't understand basic concepts 'a child could understand'.

There are people who are happy to accept 'consensus' amongst scientists and that the 'science is settled' when it wasn't too long ago that pretty much any scientist that heard a statement such as that would have laughed and dismissed it with the distain it deserves.

We've been lied about everything and the religion of science has been used to keep the lies alive.

I'm not a believer in Jesus or God or whatever but I've moved away from being a religious atheist because I realised I sounded like an arrogant prick. Thankfully, I never bought a t-shirt that said "I'm an atheist, debate me".