Its even more nasty to pretend that your terror is a nice and fair thing.. ;)
(I take it for granted that you are a american since you try to defend their world terror..)
Let's see...so far I've written who is this "poor" country?
then you attacked me so I replied well if you're going to be NASTY about it...
Then you attacked me again
Now what are you going to do?
And feel free to explain why it is a good thing that USA attack and occupy any of the nations they are attacking or already are occupying all over this planet. :)
But shall we try to start all over in a more friendly way?
And i shall try to not let my feelings get in the way of more neutral but strait answers. :)
I am pretty passionate when it comes to try to stop the governments to stop killing people.
And i truly can not understand those who support this even if i try.
Its even more nasty to pretend that your terror is a nice and fair thing.. ;)
(I take it for granted that you are a american since you try to defend their world terror..)
Let's see...so far I've written
who is this "poor" country?
then you attacked me so I replied
well if you're going to be NASTY about it...
Then you attacked me again
Now what are you going to do?
It was the word "poor"
That made it clear that you indicated that what i said was very wrong...
Wasn`t that why you put those sign around the word poor?
And feel free to explain why it is a good thing that USA attack and occupy any of the nations they are attacking or already are occupying all over this planet. :)
I dont understand that last answer.
But shall we try to start all over in a more friendly way?
And i shall try to not let my feelings get in the way of more neutral but strait answers. :)
I am pretty passionate when it comes to try to stop the governments to stop killing people.
And i truly can not understand those who support this even if i try.
I shall treat you with the caution I would use toward anyone else who has attacked me unprovoked.
I am able to see that i kind of attacked you, because i think the same, when someone attack me, i answer in the same way.
Are you able to see the same?
you consider quote marks (which you use yourself as depicted in the image I posted) as an attack?
ahh i think i understand your answer now.
And the reason i have put those sign around the word "news" is because what comes from Reuters seldom are news, but mostly propaganda lies.. ;)
So i use those to make it clear that to use the word news about Reuters "news" are completely wrong. ;)
And that is why i thought that your very first comment said that i was completely wrong.
Was i wrong about that?