Sort:  

No, like some international chess organization with tens of thousands of members, there is no coercion there. Because it doesn't have a role to dominate.

The State is for domination only, there is no other role.

Voluntary organizations are ok, in fact they are even helpful, because they offer a channel for humans to organize in their own niche.

Chessplayers can have their own group, football fans their own, steemit users their own, and so on....

People will form groups, big groups, inevitably. The question is will these be voluntary ones or coercive ones?

it doesn't have a role to dominate.
.
The State is for domination only, there is no other role

.
you got it in one.
the difference is...voting with your feet....If you do NOT like the way the chess club is being run...you leave. If you do NOT like the way your country is being run...

oh...wait..

that's a bit harder isn't it?.

Yes it is, because leaving the country you have nowhere else to go, and you can't found your own country.

Leaving a chessclub is not big deal.

no one said life was gonna be easy

yes you can found your own country.
where do you think all the countries came from?

if you want something bad enough
you can get it.

or die trying

Not anymore, all the land is claimed except Antarctica, but that is under a military treaty I believe. Besides you can't achieve sovereignty because larger countries will declare war on that country or assimilate it immediately.


You are displaying
a
failure of imagination.

think outside the box
2/3s of the planet is covered by water.

Seasteading is not possible if the UN extends it's borders every single time.

Was it last time that they extended the maritime borders to 200 miles from the coastlines?

And the UN is planning on declaring dominion over all the oceans in the world.

Government is expanding, let's face it, either we go into space or we try to change this rotten system.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.18
JST 0.031
BTC 87638.53
ETH 3170.89
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.79