You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: In America what is the point of having the First Amendment when media companies work for political parties ? ? ?
Not sure how well this fits in your post, but when you talked about googling results on both parties, be aware that google is biased toward the Democratic party. My suggestion would be to do the same search using another browser like Bing. Just saying.
Elsewhere in my posts, let me link it; well OK sorry I cannot find the old comment, some reason I can see only a certain distance backwards in my crok acct.
Search Engines are big business, as big business they want and need certain things from the Government. This government understanding maybe in questionable accounting practices, ownership laws, fair market competition or maybe even tax breaks for employing more people ; whatever . . .
Do a search of the United States use of radiation weapons in Iraq during the first Gulf War; do this search within America. Then have a friend repeat the same search overseas and check out the very different results.
Thus maybe all search engines fully cooperate with the government, after all they are in exactly the same industries ; money , power , influence ! ! !
/hugz ; )
Here is one Canadian opinion from 1998
https://ratical.org/radiation/DU/disorder.html
Generally it was not widely reported for obvious financial reasons having nothing to do with the First Amendment that the Pentagon pressured the FDA to fast track untested vaccines to be tested on military personnel in Iraq.
This urgency was heightened by the rapid build up for Desert Shield and Desert Storm, of course tens of thousands of military personnel got very sick ; but business is business. Those same exemption laws still exist for the Pentagon to utilize the next time it needs a fast little war for its masters . . .
I will check it, thank you!