Police Brutality, Politics, and Popular Opinion

in #police7 years ago (edited)

In the wee hours of yesterday morning, I posted this question about a scenario involving the police. This morning, I saw a Huffington Post article on a recent Trump speech where he said he doesn't want police to be "too nice" to suspects they arrest.

I know the HuffPo is wildly inconsistent on matters of personal liberty, but in this instance, they are quite right to condemn Trump's rhetoric. WTF, conservatives? Why does the freakin' HuffPo need to remind people that "innocent until proven guilty" is a principle that matters? Of course laws should be stacked against cops. They bear the burden of proof. That's what justice is about. That is why abuse of suspects is always wrong.

Trump and cops

Trump's casual disregard for liberty and insistence on ensuring "law enforcement" is above question is dangerous. Of course, he's hardly the only politician with these views, and his party is hardly unique, but this principle of "guilty until proven innocent" is a cancer in our society. So is the belief that, "Well, it was against the law, so the guy deserves what he got."

If there is no victim, there is no crime. If there is a victim, justice demands restitution or retribution unless the injured party chooses mercy. The government justice system is a counterfeit through and through, so it should come as no surprise that it justifies corruption and abuse as it flounders about failing to provide justice, and instead dispensing injustice as a matter if course.

And this is a perfect example of why Trump is not my president.


Image credit


SteemVerify

If you like this post, please comment, follow, and resteem!

Sort:  

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.14
JST 0.030
BTC 68854.36
ETH 3283.36
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.67