You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Poker Tip Man Armen-"Under The Gun" with Pocket Rockets
Phil gordons little green book (p. 178):
First, I count my outs, or the cards that will give me the winning hand. For Example, let's say i have 10c 9d and I put my opponents on AsKD. The flop comes Ac Td 7S... There are 5 cards -- the two remaining tens and the three nines __ that will put me in front. In other words, I have 5 outs
this author:
First thing we need to do is count the number of “Outs” we have. The slang word “Outs” implies to the number of cards that can help you improve your hand. For example; if you have AK and the flop is Q,10, 2, then we need a Jack to make a straight. There are four Jacks in a deck so you have four “Outs” to make a straight.
That might not be C+P, but its an obvious paraphrase.
Thanks for posting but I never read that book. Like I said before, it's my experiance and thoughts. Of course you will see a parallel in thoughts as we are talking about the same thing. This only supports the fact that I'm giving good advice.
that seems to be really similar wording... idk looks like paraphrase to me... either that or the information is so general as to be worthless.... either way, i stand by my position
No not general or wothless
it seems like it would be fairly easy to win a poker debate when you ahev a whale or two flagging everyone who disagrees with you.... I will let readers be the judge. But you have two pros, one of whom is famous and well known, telling you everything you posted was horrible... Id think you would take the hint.
It's easy to lose when you keep harping and don't let up on the harassment. I'd suggest that you have made your point and it's time to move on.
We all have our opinions. I did post a video of a major pro that backs up my post that out ranks any semi-pro you are talking about. Also you did bring up a published pro talking about the same thing as me so...just drop all the negativity. If you dont agree with me doesn't mean i dont know what im talking about.
Well... it could be a coincidence. It's a fundamental concept that any poker player knows. This is a very common way of explaining it.
I'm less concerned about it being plagiarism than the extremely low quality.
EDIT: Although after looking a bit harder, I think it's not unreasonable to suspect plagiarism... But there seems to be some care taken to disguise it... Also probably a language issue that will make a lot of it hard to work out.