Sort:  

From the Pizzagate Wiki:

.,.the fact that the EFits can be easily discredited, yet the absence of MSM coverage of them in their attempt to debunk pizzagate suggests that there is something to the EFits that is being covered up.

that line of reasoning makes zero sense, and even the pizzagate wiki sources this article for the information which claims it was one man..

http://www.anorak.co.uk/372377/madeleine-mccann/madeleine-mccann-the-private-detectives-secret-e-fits.html/

I see no reason to keep trying to push another agenda to conveniently fit a narrative which simply is not correct.

The fact that it could be either? Why are you so sure it absolutely couldn't be one of them? I did update the post and Wiki to be more clear.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.26
JST 0.039
BTC 100104.47
ETH 3619.58
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.10