You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: (NSFW Contains Nudity 18+ Only) Calvin Klein Underwear Photoshoot ft. Denvermax (me)Part 2 of 2
So why discuss t anyway, if you have no chance of changing or even affect other people perception of something being "art" or"pornography"?
I think the story is something else. By calling pornographic images art, the girl in the photo is put on a more acceptable category than if it is labeled pornography (though the acceptance of pornography is rising). This way the girl will keep posing for such shots and the "viewer" (who likes this kind of pornography) can get more of it and at the same time hide the true purpose of his or her "interest"
....and?
So what?
Maybe it is not really doing the girl a favor to tell her to keep doing pornography, while pretending it is art. If she get kids in the future, they may not really like that their moms pussy and ass floats around in cyberspace. Just a thought !
While I concede to you from the future, hypothetical, children's point of view, I contend that she has every right to do whatever she wishes, as an innocent and naive person or a cunning and calculating person putting on that front, and any gradation in between, so long as she doesn't impede on our rights as humans, and I think we know the answer here about whether her content does such a thing.
In freedom, beauty is achieved.