(NSFW Contains Nudity 18+ Only) Calvin Klein Underwear Photoshoot ft. Denvermax (me)Part 2 of 2
Calvin Klein Photoshoot Part 2
Model: @denvermax
Photographer: H. Morgen
https://twitter.com/HMorgen
This is a photoshoot I recently did with H. Morgen. I love Calvin Klein underwear so I was really excited she wanted to shoot in the undies.
.
.
.
.
.
Follow, Upvote & Resteem♡ I received over 100 votes on my part 1 post so here, as promised, I posted this second portion of the set. Thank You for your ongoing support!
Please also view and Upvote Part 1 of this series
I'm trying to share something I think is beautiful with the community. My intention wasn't to have a debate about if this is art to each personal viewer so I removed the art tag. Happy Steeming! <3
I don't think you needed to remove the art tag IMHO - photography is art and you clearly stated it was NSFW so anyone who has a problem with nudity shouldn't be clicking.
It does say nudity.. but there is a difference between nudity and gratuitous nudity for the purpose of arousal. You cant write a Photo essay on any of these shots - the lighting, texture, contrast, horizontal and vertical lines, shape, etc... I can point you to a few spread eagle pics if you care to compare. People obviously love these pictures - lets see how much they love them when they take up more than 1 spot on the list of trending posts. Slippery slope..
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/erotic-art/#DefEroArt thanks for confirming that this is actually art, erotic art by definition. smh
So the state is needed to tell us what is art and what is porn ? Lol
More like slippery hole ;)
Or maybe you are just aware that tits, pussy and ass sells and that it presumably are men the vast majority of whales and that they likely are turned on by your naked pussy
Upvoted. As photographer/Photographic artist that does shoot erotic art and nudes. I read the discussion above as to weather is this Art or Porn.
What is ART is subjective even without nudity. And then you take that to a new level with explicit nudity as to what is porn.
The NSFW I have posted so far leans to the Art side more but I shoot this style as well sometimes.
I would say this is either Explicit Erotic Art or Artistic Porn. Either way, nice work by all involved, I like the really white Black & White.
Yes agreed. Very beautiful. I think a lot of these negative feelings that people have stem from discomfort with the human body. Nobody is offended by animals whose gentialia are often visible. These are peculiar hang ups if one thinks about them logically.
But animals don't make photos of their genitalia)))
No but people take photos of animals (and they don't censor them) and you can go outside your house and see a dog with his balls hanging out. It is a spurious argument.
May be animals don't sensor them because people feed them))). Anyway, there are always two camps. My opinion is it is too too...plus a woman shall have a secret)))
Thank you. It's nice to have a clear definition and I think you have help clarify the type of art it is.
No problem. ;)
PERFECT :)
Thank You
Personally I think that there is just about enough pornography elsewhere on the internet and I do not find it necessary to have it on Steemit too. I am pro freedom, as an anarchist, but I am also pro freely enforced limitations if the general opinion goes towards a platform free of porn. There are trillions and trillions of crap porn filling cyberspace. It is not a way to enrich Steemit by adding more of the same here.
I likes;)
You have a nice *ss hole and I say this as nicely as I can. Some of my buddies laugh@me when I tell them I licked one ass out my lifetime thus far and the only reason I did(which I never thought I would) was because the girl I was with@the time was so clean. There was no smell, it was in my face and so I went for it! and it was quite tasty;)
So yeah you have one that I can work with, nice and thx for sharing ;)Hope this doesn't sound nasty which it probably does but hey! to each is own!
Each to their own I guess. Although if this was my daughter, I wouldn't be proud of her at all
I think it's art. Just not the typical hang on your wall picture or sculpture. But, guess you can have your opinion. I think the black and white shoot is tasteful. D I resisted saying tasty. Lol Nice art.
Thank you :)
I am still waiting for a photoshoot with a man that spreads his legs in this way ;)
Buy some gay porn !
why i have to buy? when male whales can upvote and see them for free in trending page? lol
Then don´t buy. Make it yourself
too much work. i will just wait hahahahahahahahahah
Cool
Looks more like deliberate pornography. Not that I am offended, I am just clarifying
Well it's professional photography by a talented artist and many people view the body as an art form. With that being said art is subjective to the viewer.
My philosophy is that art has two sides. The creator is "doing" something to express themselves in some way (my best description on the spot), while the observer trues to put himself in this artists place by "enjoying" his art. Whether or not that succeeds, is the degree to which the observer sees it as art (from his point of view). So basically are is subjective and not really a topic for philosophical discussion whether something is art or not
Pornography is supposed to create sexual stimulation in the observer, not creating an opportunity to put himself in the place of the "artist", therefore, when photographs focus solely on bodyparts that has always been considered sexually stimulating to look at , i consider it pornography, not art
When I look at the photos above i see no specific difference between it, and what is generally considered pornography, except being in b/w. But that in itself is not enough to qualify for labelling something art in the first place
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/erotic-art/#DefEroArtthanks for confirming that this is actually art, erotic art by definition.
I would call it "erotica" and I think it is very artistic. There is no sexual activity involved.
Agreed. Definitely erotica. Still artistic. Definitely not for everyone. And as a heterosexual female I'm not at all offended. Ah, to be young and thin again. :D
There are advantages to maturity. I have always had a liking for strong mature women. Also If I had the body of an adonis I think I would probably have these kinds of photos taken too. You might as well have something to remember from your youth and the human body is beautiful. Sadly I have a face and body that is best suited for radio so I stay behind the camera!
ROFL - that's MY line! hahaha
My husband's line is: "I used to be built like a brick shit house. Now I'm just a shit house." I love that man. :D
A few years ago I had been going through boxes of old things and found an album full of negatives. Upon further inspection I realized there were a few pages of my mother (in her early 20s before kids) in the nude. They were actually quite beautiful...even though the subject was my mother. LOL When I brought it to her attention with a little wink and wiggling eyebrow, she was not embarrassed at all. She was like, "What! I was HOT back then." GO MOM! haha. Maybe that's where I get my attitude from?
There's nothing wrong with it lol! You should ask her if you could post them:) If I had the body I would do it for sure. To be immortalised as art!
That's great to hear, Thank You :)
I agree. I think I will use EroticArt for a tag on future posts instead of art, Thank You.
You're welcome. Thank you for sharing:)
hahahahahahahahahah
I totaly agree with you. This is NOT "art" to me.
it's beautiful
Thank You
Thank You
It's okay to have different opinions :) !
I agree 100%
Pornography to you is art to someone else. Aesthetic is in the eye of the beholder.
So why discuss t anyway, if you have no chance of changing or even affect other people perception of something being "art" or"pornography"?
I think the story is something else. By calling pornographic images art, the girl in the photo is put on a more acceptable category than if it is labeled pornography (though the acceptance of pornography is rising). This way the girl will keep posing for such shots and the "viewer" (who likes this kind of pornography) can get more of it and at the same time hide the true purpose of his or her "interest"
....and?
So what?
Maybe it is not really doing the girl a favor to tell her to keep doing pornography, while pretending it is art. If she get kids in the future, they may not really like that their moms pussy and ass floats around in cyberspace. Just a thought !
While I concede to you from the future, hypothetical, children's point of view, I contend that she has every right to do whatever she wishes, as an innocent and naive person or a cunning and calculating person putting on that front, and any gradation in between, so long as she doesn't impede on our rights as humans, and I think we know the answer here about whether her content does such a thing.
In freedom, beauty is achieved.
That's not pornography.