You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: (NSFW Contains Nudity 18+ Only) Calvin Klein Underwear Photoshoot ft. Denvermax (me)Part 2 of 2
I'm trying to share something I think is beautiful with the community. My intention wasn't to have a debate about if this is art to each personal viewer so I removed the art tag. Happy Steeming! <3
I don't think you needed to remove the art tag IMHO - photography is art and you clearly stated it was NSFW so anyone who has a problem with nudity shouldn't be clicking.
It does say nudity.. but there is a difference between nudity and gratuitous nudity for the purpose of arousal. You cant write a Photo essay on any of these shots - the lighting, texture, contrast, horizontal and vertical lines, shape, etc... I can point you to a few spread eagle pics if you care to compare. People obviously love these pictures - lets see how much they love them when they take up more than 1 spot on the list of trending posts. Slippery slope..
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/erotic-art/#DefEroArt thanks for confirming that this is actually art, erotic art by definition. smh
So the state is needed to tell us what is art and what is porn ? Lol
More like slippery hole ;)
Or maybe you are just aware that tits, pussy and ass sells and that it presumably are men the vast majority of whales and that they likely are turned on by your naked pussy