But It's True For Me!

Yeah, but if it's true for you, it isn't true at all. The idea that every individual has a right to his or her own version of truth, is in my opinion increasing the polarization we witness in our times.

_{source: Picpedia}

An excerpt from the short interview that's being dismantled in the video below this article:

Dawkins: "You mean true for you is different that true for anybody else? How can something be true for you. Something either got to be true or not."

O'Reilly: "No, no. I can't prove to you that Jesus is God, so that truth is mine, and mine alone. But you can't prove to me that Jesus is not. So you have to stay in your little believe-system..."

Dawkins: "You can't prove Zeus is not, you can't prove Apollo is not, or Mithra..."

The decades long celebration of the individual as the highest authority for assessing truth, has led to the idea that we can all have our own version of reality, or at least that's how I see it ;-) It has given us an environment where Bill O'Reilly can say weird things like "it's true for me", and still keep his job as a public spokesperson. Truth is by definition shared; truth is that which is factual regardless of my or your opinion about it. Reality is what's there, what's happening with or without our presence. The fact that each and every one of us has their own model of reality projected by their individual brains, shouldn't be a reason to abandon that reality altogether. That is, whenever we discuss anything at all, we do so with the assertion that such a truth exists, or else all discussion is pointless.

It is factual, however, that we all do have our own world-model, our own perspective on reality, which leads to the inescapable conclusion that "the" truth can not be known by any individual. Again, through discussion, through interaction with other people, all as curious and hungry to learn about that reality as ourselves, we're able to compare our versions of reality, with the ultimate goal of defining what's true for all of us; only by sharing our inner world-models, our ideas about reality, can we come to a shared truth. And only by holding these shared truths are we able to build a shared future, are we able to cooperate and manage to create the highly technically advanced society of today.

Now, there's tons of ways to get to a shared truth, with the most notable division being the one between religion and science. In the search for such shared truths, we inevitably reach the limit of what we're able or willing to investigate. At some point we must take some things as a given, take them for granted, even in science. Such as the origin of the universe; my truth about that matter is that we don't know the truth about that matter yet, and maybe we never will, while others, like Bill O'Reilly know that God made it all by speaking words, and yet others don't believe this reality exists at all, that it's all a construct of the mind, of consciousness. I don't want to make this about religion, atheism or spiritualism, but I do want to point out the meaninglessness of asserting that something is true for you, because that just doesn't make it true.

_{Is the World Returning to the Dark Ages? | Salman Rushdie}

However defective or incomplete, the shared truths as reached by the scientific method is in my opinion the most reliable method of attaining said truths, as it strictly deals with the external, the observable, the repeatable and the disprovable facts of our material plane of existence, with "disprovable" being a very important factor. Unfortunately, as illustrated in the video above, there's a growing mistrust in all forms of authority, including the academia. This is unfortunate, but not beyond comprehension as far as I'm concerned; we're all familiar with the so-called "experts" who are being paraded on television, just to advance some ideological or political opinion. Regardless of your personal stance on the matter, the scientists spreading the climate scare are a large part of this, but also psychologists and "experts" in the humanities, sociology and economy are constantly defending opposing sides in all sorts of socio-economic and political arguments, thereby eroding the trust we used to have in them.

I've seen, during my life in western Europe, the demise of the common good and the downfall of "big ideas". Idealism is dead, because a political or economical idealism takes one, or a handful, of characteristics of human existence and builds all truths around them. Communism takes the community as its pivotal center and describes the role of the individual around that truth. Capitalism takes the individual as its pivotal center and describes the role of society around that truth. Communism is dead, but at the same time capitalism has thereby lost its balancing force, so now all things in life are reduced to short term individualistic goals, mostly of the materialistic kind. Extreme individualism is as harmful as extreme collectivism, but the purely individualistic nature of our existence seems to have taken hold as an axiomatic truth upon which to build our shared reality. And the bias-bubbles created by online search-algorithms aren't helping either...

In the end though, I believe we'll have to realize that truth can only be attained through interaction with other human beings, as it is through their eyes that we can see another perspective on reality than our own, and to compare our own with. By bouncing ideas off each other about the reality we both observe, we can come to a mutual understanding and recognition of that reality. And we need that shared reality for us all to exist in. Truth, like the world, is shared, and not something to claim as our own.

To complicate this complicated matter even further, I'll close by reminding you, dear reader, that all this is my personal perspective on the matter of truth...

_{It’s True For Me – Debunked (Bill O’Reilly Exposed)}

---

Thanks so much for visiting my blog and reading my posts dear reader, I appreciate that a lot :-) If you like my content, please consider leaving a comment, upvote or resteem. I'll be back here tomorrow and sincerely hope you'll join me. Until then, keep steeming!

Recent articles you might be interested in:

Latest article >>>>>>>>>>>	Bitvavo: EASY Crypto Access
The Devil Has Pointy Ears	Ahmed Mohamed Revisited
Dutch Journalists Demand Truth	Disagree Without Being Disagreeable
Cultural Marxism	Shill Maher

Thanks for stopping by and reading. If you really liked this content, if you disagree (or if you do agree), please leave a comment. Of course, upvotes, follows, resteems are all greatly appreciated, but nothing brings me and you more growth than sharing our ideas. It's what Steemit is made for!

I am a proud helpinaut! @Helpie is looking for new members! Helpie has been growing nicely and we are always on the lookout for new valuable members. We are very supportive and community oriented. If you would like to be scouted for @helpie , please drop a comment on THIS POST or contact @paintingangels on discord at paintingangels(serena)#3668.

Just for Full Disclosure, I'm invested in these crypto-currencies:

Bitcoin | Litecoin | EOS | OmiseGo | FunFair | KIN | Pillar | DENT | Polymath | XDCE | 0x | Decred | Ethereum | Carmel | XYO



@helpie is a WITNESS now! So please help @helpie help you by voting for us here!