RE: Property rights exist because we have morality
Ah - I thought that sounded like campus lefty bs... A few obvious tells from the front page of that so-called 'anarchist' site: The Chomsky effect, Interview with a Mexican Comrade, Down With The Family, When Non-Violence is Suicide, Anarchists-Intersectionality-Races-Islamophobia-Etc. Does that sound like a rather large wheelbarrow of the same, old, extreme-left narrative to anyone else?
But go ahead and read that Proud-horn waffle (if you can wade through such thick molasses) - just treat it as the opposite of what @freebornsociety purports it to be. And ain't it kinda funny how the property-is-theft crowd lay such a stern claim of ownership upon the meaning of anarchy? Literally, the word means 'no ruler'.
But it is noteworthy that @freebornsociety is able to acknowledge that 'Rule by force is the disease' and I'm curious about if / how they think the left is any less culpable of this than the right...
I agree that it was written for a better educated audience than the average today, but folks didn't have anything to do but read and discuss ideas back then, once the work was done.
This book does a better job of breaking it down into bite sized pieces.
If the status quo refuses to acknowledge the violence that keeps them in power the only way to reach them is to show them the errors attached to using violence to stay in power.
If you believe that the status quo isn't kept in place by violence, try resisting when a cop pulls you over for not following the rules like a good boot licker.
They will literally crash you car without regard for your safety, I know, I have first hand personal experience because of a plant, tyvm.
I am afraid that until you open your mind we are really wasting our time, but I got plenty, so go right ahead, if that is your thing.