There can certainly be reason to differentiate between reality/nature "out there" and "in here", but the point you make in this article is most definately valid and important.
Some people have decided that everything over which human beings had little controll must be better than where human beings had controll and made a choice. And some people want to suggest that when someone makes a choice with which they disagree, not only is it against nature (as could be true in theory) but also they all of a sudden leap to suggest that it is "not natural".
-They are both wrong, and not seldom do they carry this forward in trying to force this wrong on the rest of us.
Yes, I agree. I wrote this entirely based on what I thought would look cool for a title, and went for the punchline in the end lol. It's important to differentiate what you've said there :)
Thanks for the great response!