You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Isn't the "social contract" a little bit overdue? And who agreed to it in the first place?

" even in your ideal society you need some intermediary principle or entity to enforce the rules.."

Yes. Voluntaryism and a government who's only job is to protect my property rights. My land, my things, my body.

For it to be a real social contract, it needs to be voluntary. Someone would have to go to my door and present an idea to me, and I would have to purchase that idea, and sign my name.

It is just about things being voluntary or not. Taxes are theft, because I never signed to pay them. If I had the choice I could have signed it..I don't know. Maybe? But most likely I would join another society with no redistribution of money. I would like someone to protect me and my property, so perhaps police and military is ncie to have. Other than that what use is the Government?

I follow and agree to certain rules if they match my principles - because to me there is good and evil. I also follow some other rules, but that's because I have to under the threat of a Gun. I don't believe in God, but I believe in good deeds and bad acts. I'm not a relativist. I follow my own morality and my own values. And there is some objectivity to that. No one has a value or morality that is " I try to kill as many people as possible, and at every chance I have I steal or rape" Those are not great ideals or values. They are objectively evil ideals.

Thanks for the comment man!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 75077.06
ETH 2851.79
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.48