RE: Is the blockchain the new Global City? - Part II
Hi to all Steemians as you can see from this post, there is inside censorship working, disruptive behaviors trying to destroy steemit and the most valued posts no matter if they are good or bad.
I would like to understand the motive of the by downvote, maybe someone could explain here, but sure everybody is afraid of the same silencing gun.
To finish I'll quote this post on the strategies going on on Steemit.
b) - Destructive strategy: control self-interested groups inducing chaos or manipulation by trying to control the collective resources pool or creating proposals that affect the flow of resources, vision, and mission of the network, signs of a dissolving society.
c) - Hierarchic or Oligarchic strategy: propositions for a change of the community by 1% of power owners of organizations inside and outside the community and characteristic of a hierarchic society.
This war to control the Power and the honey pot is shooting innocent bystanders.
Thanks for those who are not in fear.
If it was for the mention of @krnel, I love it, it helps to show about targeted pursuit.
Today the a large portion of the whales started an experiment to not vote, meaning that dolphins and minnows will have greater effects on distributing the reward pool. (This also means they are foregoing their curation rewards during this period.)
However they felt that the experiment doesn't work without all of the whales not voting, so there are some that are flagging purely to negate the vote of whales that hadn't gotten word of the experiment, don't want to, etc. So it doesn't have anything to do with your post personally.
Admittedly the communication about this to the platform as a whole could have been better. I had just happened to of caught @abit's post on this earlier here. The post by @timcliff also was useful to get some additional details on it here.
Thanks a lot for your comment.
What's happening in the Platform is very clear.
All users are guinea pigs in experiments (because there is no consensus just plain war between the power).
Now there is a campaign going on to show that some mighty whales have these rights because they are doing it for the platform and the users.
Sorry for this strong, but I lived all my youth under fascism.
Do Steemians think that Doctor Mendel had the consent of his victims to proceed with the experiments?.
But I do remember from the speeches on Radio, that all of them would say this beautiful words in the beginning. "we have reached a consensus on the measures we are going to apply, and we are doing it for the benefit of all".
The message is clear that to write on steemit we must venerate this beautiful experiments where people are just practicing targets for the war going on on the top.
We are just toys in a playground.
And everybody is being manipulated by fear of retaliation and this will kill steemit.
It's incredible that a platform where bloggers have to fight for their right to post freely without being harassed by some warlords.
So the absence of outside censorship is directly proportional to the censorship inside.
"Nobody has the rights to use other people for their own interests."
And playing with human feelings is being made in the name of "science".
I'm stopping here because from what I was going to get out of the scope of your question.
And it had to do with my post because I was targeted in the aleatory experience and I'm a person, not an object to play with.
I know what the message is, comply and accept it has fate and be happy on voluntary servitude. lol