Exploring the Flat Earth subject a lil bit more...

I've mostly stayed out of the Flat Earth discussion/debate cause of various reasons.
Yet, recently.. I engaged a bit on my page. And.. It's been interesting! Heh.
I plan to speak more on what I think about my experiences in the future, but today I just wanna touch on a really fascinating example of psychology.

First let me start by saying.. I've never once in my life that I can remember appealed to "Occam's Razor" by citing it.
I don't think the simplest answer is usually the answer.
This gets into weird territory, but.. Me personally.. I just never really liked resorting to using that as a wedge in argument. I think oftentimes the answer is NOT the simplest one.

Well.. To be fair, I can't remember specifically citing Occam's Razor, but I'm sure I have argued for the logic of what makes more sense in a simplistic way at times.
And I guess technically even if you don't cite Occam's Razor, you are still using that principle when you base a logical conclusion on such types of reasoning. So.. I guess I have prolly used it before, but as I said I often think the answers are usually not simple.

ANYWAYS.. I recently found one of the new Flat Earth theories(At least I think it's new) going around is based on Occam's Razor and it's really interesting..
The advocates suggest that.. Because there is no perception or feeling of the earth moving, that the simplest answer is that it is not.

Did you catch that? It's some fascinating logic. The earth is not moving, cause we can't sense it moving.
Of course this rational has to deny all of the empirical historical evidence in history of the opposite but..
It is neat to think about how Flat Earth people can take one of these common debate principles and weave it into their very far fetched theory so effortlessly.

Here's my problem with that theory though. Is that REALLY the simplest answer?
Think about it.. To assume that that is the simplest answer, you almost have to assume that there is a God being out there that created the earth as basically the center of the universe.
The flat earth model in my opinion does not work without some kind of divine intervention, nature does not shape things like that IMO.
You can explain a spherical earth much better in scientific manner than you can a flat earth. No need to necessarily appeal to a God being.

I guess in essence what I'm trying to say is.. What is truly the more simple explanation?
That we don't perceive the earth moving cause it's not cause a God being created a flat earth at the center of the universe for us to inhabit?
Or that science has been decently close in explaining things like Gravity and the Big Bang and how all this order can somehow come from nothing or chaos.

In one scenario, you have to invoke the power of a God being, which just seems totally irrational in so many ways.
And in the other scenario life basically just exploded out of nothing and started forming together in more complex fashion.

To be straight forward, they both sound incredibly unlikely.. But to me, one certainly seem a lot less likely than the other.
I think it seems much more likely there's spherical planets all around the universe and that someday we will explore the stars.
I think it seems much less likely that there's a God being out there who was like.. Ima make you humans the center of the universe! And all that shit in space will forever be beyond your reach, and nothing is really going on out there. It's all going on down here on Earth.
Anyways.. I just thought that was interesting how they were using Occam's Razor, but.. Perhaps didn't take that principle further to the whole concept of God in the first place.
Who out there would argue that a God being creating everything would be more consistent with Occam's Razor than some kind of random self forming construct?

Furthermore, just as an aside.. So far, I think almost every Flat Earther I've seen that I've met has resorted to biblical fanaticism to compel their points.
And if they didn't bring up God in relation, perhaps they still do believe that and just haven't vocalized it.

Are there any Flat Earthers out there who DON'T believe in a God being?
And if so, how do they explain the earth being Flat while virtually all other planetary bodies and stars and moons we see through telescopes are spherical?
Like how does that jive with science and everything we have observed?
Why would this earth be SOOOOOO much different from all the other planets..?

PS Just to be clear, I don't really subscribe to the scientific theory in regards to how we came into existence either if anyone thinks that, but I do think it seems more likely than a "creator god being" .
I'm personally more of a Pantheist in the sense I think that EVERYTHING is "God" and that to me "God" is more of the language behind the universe, the programming, the fabric of reality, a spiritual energy.. Not some actual physical being.
And even in a Pantheistic sense, why would nature create a flat plane with Earth as like the center of the universe? When a spherical object just makes so much more sense based on so many different reasons.