You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: My view regarding the upcoming HF...

in #palnet2 years ago (edited)

'How difficult would it be to implement a mechanism that allows only 1 bot per post? Wouldn't we avoid that mess on the trending page?'

Yes, and ... like we already talked about last week; with a limited bidamount of max 5 Steem for example.
And then let's look at the Trending page again to see if all that "quality" content of today is still on top of that list.

Sort:  

The real question is: Will bot owners agree with that?

A bot is just an automated account, if they don't voluntarily agree to it, how would you stop them? There would need to be a mechanism to nuke their vote down if it passes a threshold. I feel like we should have a bot nuking mechanism anyways, but that's probably not a popular opinion.

I feel like we should have a bot nuking mechanism anyways,

Wouldn't that be awesome?

Didn't even want to bring that in with my comment above because with having too much interest in maintaining the currect situation they will never allow it.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 1.31
TRX 0.12
JST 0.139
BTC 59710.81
ETH 2144.17
BNB 473.77
SBD 8.90