You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The “origins” debate is 157 years ongoing today
Darwin is considered outdated and incomplete by current science, so I wonder any real biologist is still debating into Darwin. Currently the DNA is mapped, and the same for mDNA , pRNA and more. Antibiotics are being produced using selections, and we have GMOs in the supermarket.
The simple idea there is a debate on Darwin in 2017 is pretty hilarious, being honest. At the point science is, like CRISPR , there is a little doubt about the evolution of species: not exactly how Darwin said, but still it is a well known issue, with commercial applications too.
The debate is, most likely, only in some bible belt, which likes to think there is still room for a debate.
''..........so I wonder any real biologist is actually into Darwin.''
Such an ignorant, idiotic statement. So because science advances and new discoveries are made, no one should ''be into'' the pioneers of physics, astronomy, mathematics, biology etc?
Straw man argument. Never said people should ignore it. Muted.
lol. That's the right attitude. Welcome to Steemit.
Btw, nice job editing your posts ;)