Which bogus vaccine paper?
http://www.naturalnews.com/048753_Wakefield_study_MMR_vaccine_autism.html
Check out the comments for the numerous studies that replicate and show a link between autism and vaccines (thimerosal).
read the comments to see the author of that blog get shilled out.
http://archives.cjr.org/feature/sticking_with_the_truth.php
http://www.publichealth.org/public-awareness/understanding-vaccines/vaccine-myths-debunked/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3136032/
I don't even need to debunk any of those myths as they right off the bat again dismiss the obvious and marginalize it to one study when in fact this has been studied for DECADES before Wakefield, mercury is poison.
so is chlorine...
do use table salt when cooking?
Table salt and a heavy metal known to cause numerous adverse effects in the ma mal nervous system at even trace amounts (<5ppm) are two worlds of difference, and removing that context is wrong.
guilt by association technique huh? If there was no problems with the papers why were they withdrawn? Who cares what a journalist says...it's all fake news anyway isn't it?
That's a complex question fallacy also known as loaded question fallacy three times. Best stick with arguments about data and verifiable at that.
The thing is that mercury was studied and linked numerous times to neurological adverse effects, it's not as if that was the first or last time casualty could be inferred from the data.