Las Vegas Sheriff Changes Timeline of Events on Floor 32, Leaving More Questions Than Answers. Covering Up Slow Police Response? Or Something More?

in #news7 years ago (edited)

The Daily Mail has reported that the police investigating the recent mass shooting in Las Vegas have drastically changed their version of events that transpired on the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Hotel. They also say they have no idea why the shooting stopped when it did.

sheriff

Originally, police had claimed that a security guard had interrupted the shooting and had been shot at by 200 rounds through the door and hallway of the hotel. They said that their police team arrived moments later. However, now they have totally changed this timeline so that, in fact (they say), the security guard was shot at and injured 6 minutes before the main shooting spree even started!

This leaves important questions to be answered:

  • Why were no police called immediately to the hotel when the hotel security worker (Jesus Campos) reported being shot?
  • Why were police not immediately directed to that room once the main shooting started on the outside of the building, considering that the hotel security team knew very well that shots had already been fired from that specific room?
  • Why did the police initially give the wrong information to the press?
  • Since the new timeline allows for an 'inside job' and stephen paddock being a 'patsy' even more - where is the footage from the hotel's security camera system?

Intended get-away?


Additionally, the police are now saying that the shooter fired at large fuel tanks, attempting to detonate them and cause a distraction to cover his escape. The tanks somehow sustained the bullet strikes that hit them and thankfully did not explode.

Why did the shots stop? A Patsy? Mind Control?


The police timeline shows that the shooting stopped just 2 minutes before police arrived on floor 32. They police claim that they don't know why he stopped shooting at that point.

I find the timing of this interesting for several reasons.

My main thoughts on possible motives and causes for this shooting involve either Stephen Paddock either being a 'patsy', who was innocent but made to look like the shooter by the real killer (whose real motives may have been political) - or, Stephen being the real shooter, but having acted not in a full state of consciousness, but instead his actions being the result of mind control programming of the type that whistleblowers have described the US military to have developed to create 'undetectable assassins' (For more on the infamous MKUltra programs, check out the videos at the end of a previous post).

In the first case, another person would have been in the room and would have had to have escaped in the short period between the shooting stopping and police arriving (assuming that the police are not involved directly to hide the truth). If the shooter knew that the police were going to enter the floor imminently (perhaps by having assistance from someone else monitoring the hotel security system or police communications), then they would have stopped just in time for them to somehow escape undetected. I accept that 2 minutes is a short time to give yourself to escape, however, it is also ENOUGH time if a route is available.

In the second case, it has been exposed by several deprogrammers that mind control victims who have been programmed for assassination missions typically also have a suicide program encoded into them which can be triggered remotely via phone or other signal. The handlers would not have wanted Paddock to be caught alive and so once they realised the police were getting close, they may have triggered him to kill himself.

I appreciate that these might seem 'far out' for many people - but the situation as it stands is completely unexplained, so we are left only with looking at all the possibilities and these are certainly two of them.

Given that someone else's phone charger was apparently found in the room, there was a warning online days before the event from an anonymous poster that said to avoid Las Vegas because a mass killing was going to occur, whose intention was to motivate the installation of massive security measures in Casinos and elsewhere (allegedly planned by manufacturers of security technology for profit and political gain), a hotel employee has apparently gone missing after stating in an interview that Stephen Paddock had no unusual luggage with him, false flag attacks are standard operating procedure for the CIA and t hey have no quarms with killing innocents AND that the police are changing their story, plus not releasing any security footage....

Given all that, I think it is important to question everything and look at all the possibilities.

Phony Reports of Shooters & Other Suspects


There have been many claims that there were other shots fired at other Casinos - although I have not seen any tangible evidence that shows actual damage to the building, injuries or bullet holes. The police have claimed that the many calls they received of shots at other casinos were false and possibly even a diversionary tactic designed to give the shooter extra time.

Police audio mentions an older male suspect in fatigues leaving the hotel area, carrying a Black Bag Towards an RV. I am not sure at this point of the timing of that report, but it is intriguing that there may be some chance that this character could have somehow been involved - like an amazingly skilled hitman as we sometimes see in Hollywood movies such as 'Leon'.

Whatever the truth of these ideas, the police have stated that he had help!

The research continues!

Wishing you well,
Ura Soul


signature


assume I'm human


Buy My T-Shirts, Gifts & Other Clothing Here.


ureka.org

Sort:  

The tanks somehow sustained the bullet strikes that hit them and thankfully did not explode.

Aviation fuel can't be ignited that way. So, ignorance on the shooters behalf helped.

Bad Thought Advocate : I would have placed a Tannerite package near the tanks. Shot the tanks and then shot the package.

it is also possible that he did not actually intend to even shoot at them but did anyway - i have read claims that at that distance, the bigger weapon he is alleged to have used would not have been easy to aim at all and may have just created a vague cone of fire.

Two rifles had scopes on them. He brought those to aim at something.

sure, could have been that, yes

curated for #informationwar

Relevance: information control in high profile incident

so we are left only with looking at all the possibilities and these are certainly two of them.

Well, there is the third option, which doesn't require any conspiracy theories at all.

Mandalay Bay Shooter Ending Theory

that is an option too, yes - although police already stated that they suspect he had help - which by definition means a conspiracy and thus a theory - albeit not inherently related to the question of why he may have shot himself.

Yes. Help in getting the stuff up to his room. Not necessarily help in getting out.

In the last briefing, the Sheriff stated that he had body armor, which he wasn't wearing when he shot himself. Which goes to the theory that he was going to cause some sort of mayhem and then attempt to sneak out as a member of the SWAT team.

No, the police sheriff specifically stated that he suspected Paddock had help directly in committing the crime: http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/did-stephen-paddock-have-accomplice-fbi-las-vegas-police-clash-over-co-conspirator-theory-1642009

I watched both press conferences live.

He was suggesting someone helped him get the guns up there and there is leaked information from Steve Wynn that someone let him use the service elevators. Nobody was in the room with him.

Nobody was in the room with him.
In the face of an absence of proof or even reliable evidence, I remain open to all possibilities.

This post has received a 40.00 % upvote from @upgoater thanks to: @ura-soul.

This post has received a 7.53 % upvote from @booster thanks to: @ura-soul.

In the second case, it has been exposed by several deprogrammers that mind control victims who have been programmed for assassination missions typically also have a suicide program encoded into them which can be triggered remotely via phone or other signal.

I can't back this. This goes against what I understand possible from the limits of the laws of physics.

I do know shadow governments use mind programming but I don't think something like you described is possible at this point.

‘Give me a baby and I can make any kind of man.’ These are the words of - John B. Watson, the founder of behaviorism.

According to Watson's world view, the behavior of organisms, including human beings, is predictable and therefore controllable.

There are some very interesting facts about this shooting on a synchromystic level. I won't go into this here and your post taught me a couple of interesting things so that's why I upvoted it.

I think there was only one shooter. There's nothing that point to 2 shooter. People talking about 2 shooters would probably be because of the auditory effect where it seemed like there was 2 shooters.

As for shadow governments being behind this, everything is possible. We don't know and probably won't know. I prefer exposing the Federal Reserve crime.

I can't back this. This goes against what I understand possible from the limits of the laws of physics.

I'm not clear why you would say this - the laws of physics don't explicitly relate to the bio-chemistry and psychology that is involved in mind control in a way that limits the possibility of implanting a program that can be triggered.

The idea of triggering an embedded program in the mind of a human is really just an extension of what is seen in the famous "pavlov's dogs" experiment where behavior was encoded into dogs based on trigger sounds. Have you researched MkUltra?

I know MKUltra. I know pavlov's dog which was a very small trigger. Nothing like hypnosis for many hours and do complex stuff.

You're also talking about a trigger to self destruct.

I think there would be more chance of controlling someone by threatening them to torture them if they don't do something and threaten them to torture one of their love one if they they kill themselves before accomplishing the task that is ask of them and this would be most probably must simpler and make a lot more sense.

My point in highlighting pavlov's dogs is that it is a very basic way of demonstrating how a trigger can be used to unconsciously initiate a learned behavior.

The form of programming used in MKUltra and derivatives was/is such that the personality fragments due to trauma and within each compartment can be stored programs and mental databases of information. Your comment about trauma suggests that you are not aware of the trauma component of MKUltra. The programming I am pointing to is called 'trauma based mind control' - there is no threat of trauma since the trauma is actual and real. Trauma is used on children at a young age to split their personalities and to then install alternate 'altar' personalities that can be programmed and recalled later for functional purposes. This is the idea that was expressed in the famous movie 'the manchurian candidate' and that has since been described at length by alleged deprogrammers such as fritz springmeier - who can be heard explaining much of this in the video I linked to here originally.

I know Fritz Springmeier. I know about so called alternate personalities.

I'm not saying these theory are impossible but they are super far fetch and really seems to push the limit of what is possible to the point of making little sense to me.

The way the brain learns and react to stimuli make me doubt those kind of super complex learn behavior make no sense.

Plus to me the point is moot.

Governments are creating suffering for billions of people from ways really simple to prove yet people know nothing about the easily provable unfair government scheme and how they hurt everyone and that's on what we should concentrate.

I choose not to deny any data points or programs as they all have potential to affect me and life in general. I came to research mind control in great depth after finding it's effects in my own life directly. I am not able to prove 100% that trauma based mind control of the type that Fritz and others have documented does indeed exist as they say - however, I have now listened to numerous people who claim to have been part of the programs or witnessed them for some reason. Some of those people are well known now and some are not.

In terms of the technical process of compartmentalising a consciousness and causing altars to co-exist, I see no reason at all to think that this cannot occur. Anyone who has worked with healing trauma (as I have) will quickly learn that 'trauma walls' (denial) are commonly created in moments of extreme trauma - so the part required to split the personality is actually quite easy to understand and define. The programming of sub-personalities is a more complex issue, but given the resources that were admitted decades ago to have been thrown into this subject it is highly likely to me that success was found. As a system engineer, when reading the book 'Trance Formation of America' it is apparent that the methodologies described are of the exact form that I would have expected to have been used in such a project in that time period.

MKultra was admitted to (quietly) by the US government and compensation paid etc.
Given that the purpose of the program was to create a wide ranging field of study that had the potential for a wide variety of other projects - some of which have been uncovered by researchers - it would be short sighted to attempt to simply guess that the projects failed. Project Artichoke and Project Oak Tree are two that have been exposed as involving children being born specifically into the programs and deliberately altered / programmed to attempt to create supersoldiers and there have even been 'supersoldier conferences' where numerous people have come forward and told their side of the story.

In short, I see quite a lot of evidence that this is real and very little that it is not real.

It is entirely possible to study this topic while also studying the topics you are focusing on and I have done just that for over a decade. ;)

Thanks. I better understand where you come from. I read about Project Artichoke. I don't remember reading about Project Oak Tree.

I still doubt programming can be done but I know the difference between knowing and not knowing so I'm on the same boat as you. I don't know if it's possible and hard to fathom doesn't mean impossible.

I might not have studied it as much as you and that can make a huge difference.

I am currently the 'webmaster' for 'the bases project' which is a long term research project into the phenomena which are connected to underground military bases around the world. I am not directly involved in the choices of interviews and the interviews themselves - although I may be interviewed for it myself soon. I mention this because they have a long catalogue of interviews with researchers who are looking into these topics as well as some of the alleged survivors. Occasionally they interview someone that I don't think/feel is being honest - but I think the majority are being mostly or totally honest.

I am probably going to help Miles from the Bases Project get on Steemit in the near future, so more material on this will be available here. He would like to use DTube, but it's a bit too unreliable presently for it to be a complete replacement for PooTube ;)

Thanks for clarifying and remaining open to the possibilities here.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.029
BTC 74698.65
ETH 2837.65
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.46