I've heard that wikileaks doesn't expose any zionist misbehavior, do you know if this is true? If so, then I wouldn't trust it as reliable source.
I've heard that wikileaks doesn't expose any zionist misbehavior, do you know if this is true? If so, then I wouldn't trust it as reliable source.
@tommycordero Unfortunately that is accurate, but what they do release, I believe is factual. So ya I take what they supply with a grain of salt.
Great question Tom, thanks for posting
@tommycordero @lecrazycanuckeh
Be interesting to see the evidence that Wikileaks doesn't expose any zionist misbehavior
I would think it would be pretty hard to prove something they haven't done.
I guess the only way this could be proved is if there was concrete evidence Wikileaks had/has sensitive material on a zionist movement and were purposely withholding it.
There are millions of documents on www.wikileaks.org from all over the world not just the main stream ones you hear about. If you take the time to have a read you might find what you are looking for.
Remember Wikileaks has only published 1% of the #Vault7 archive so far. I'd personally hold back on forming an opinion and encouraging this Wikileaks/zionist idea until the rest of it has been released. It could be embarrassing otherwise.
@fortified The WikiLeaks Zionist link is nothing new, been noticeable for years (long before vault7) but of course will wait and see. Assange has also praised Israeli officials, so at this point it would be shocking! Many people have connected the links just as many like to ignore them (which is well in their rights)
Assange is also on record stating he believes the official 9/11 (insane) story. For some that is enough proof that he is "controlled opposition"
Thanks for comment, Cheers
It just feels like a bit of a strong reaction to have with so little evidence. Trust me I have looked. I have no political agenda or leaning I simply want to know the truth. Truth can only be based on irrefutable evidence. Until that happens forming such a strong and potentially damaging opinion on someone/something can be dangerous and indirectly contribute to the disinfo war going on.
Even @TitusFrost in his video said he had no proof there is a connection.
If you feel so strongly about this wikileaks zionist link and want other people to believe you then perhaps make a new post that is fully fact checked and sourced with linked material that reinforces you view. Because I haven't seen that from anyone yet. I would read it and share it for sure.
Wikileaks has been releasing leaked documents for 10 years now. There are millions of documents on there. Over the years they have exposed a lot of corruption all over the world and done a lot for all of our freedoms.
Remember the US/UN created Isreal. It doesn't make any sense for wikileaks to leak half the stuff they've leaked over the years if your argument was remotely true.
Something being noticed isn't proof. When a scientist notices something they then test what they have noticed to gain evidence of it's existence. There are always anomalies in any research this is why you keep researching and digging deeper to weed out these anomalies in the data set. The evidence found is then put into the public domain for scrutiny. Who has noticed it? How many times? Where? These are the questions that need to be dug into.
This I'd be interested in seeing if you could point me in the direction to some proof (I'm not calling you out. It would be genuinely interesting to see) But even praising officials isn't a crime. Who did he praise? In what context? when? why? (Conformation bias could be coming into play here)
Again interested to see this as well. If its on record I guess you could point me in the direction of him actually saying this. I don't disbelieve you but it would be good to see. I've had a quick search online but couldn't find an original statement from him. I ask you because I'm assuming you've done your research and it would be easy for you to link me the original statement he made.
My basic point is. Without real true evidence the wikileaks zionist story is potentially very damaging to Wikileaks.
Don't forget to engage critical thinking and occam's razor. Don't allow conformation bias to taint what is actually in front of you. It's not as complex as you make out it to be. It is complex but not as complex. The evidence points you to a lot simpler answer.
A CIA employee/contractor stole some files and sent them to Wikileaks because the employee saw what was going on and wasn't impressed by the CIA being a major deepstate player and spying on everyone for their own agenda. Wikileaks has only released 1% of #Vault7 so far. This just outlines the tools the CIA use. Next they will tell us who they spied when and why. This is not over by a long way. This is why I suggest holding you judgement until after it has been released. Otherwise you maybe just embarrassing yourself at this moment in time.