Are you saying that the act of influenza vaccination increases flu patients? What is the solution?
By the way, on the map, the United States is a really big country. The Rocky Mountains and the Mississippi River were divided into western, midwest, and eastern parts of the United States.
Unlike the United States, China is divided into two parts, the Yellow River and the Yangtze River.
Thank you for the good information.
Yes. I am specifically citing proof that influenza vaccination can only be potentially useful (if the vaccine does not cause harm, which vaccination does to ~10% of people) in a fraction of cases diagnosed as influenza each year, because only 16% of those diagnoses are actually influenza, there are multiple types of influenza, and a vaccine can only target one of them.
While my anecdotal observations are statistically irrelevant, I have observed influenza vaccination causing disease. There is little study of this problem because pharmaceutical companies cannot make money from vaccines if those vaccines are proved to cause harm, and pharmaceutical companies fund most of the research into vaccines. Rather than funding such studies, the pharmaceutical industry has financial incentive to suppress such research.
The solution I have determined on is not to be vaccinated. I cannot be harmed by a vaccine I do not receive (unless others that receive it are vectors for that harm to me) and the negligible benefit that may theoretically be lost to me is inconsequential, as I provably do not get the flu in many years. I have not gotten the flu in over 30 years, and therefore have not lost anything by not being vaccinated during that time.
Thanks!