Sean Spicer says "Hitler didn't even use chemical weapons" and Trump is trying to "destabilize region".

I felt compelled to write this post after Sean Spicer spoke with Wolf Blitzer to apologize for saying "Hitler didn't even use chemical weapons" during today's press conference. What makes this story even more interesting is during the apology he said Trump is trying to "destabilize the region".

Video from Christoher Spect.

There is something truly off regarding bombing Syria because they used chemical weapons on their citizens. I am not arguing the possibility this event was not perpetuated by the Syrian government. Ron Paul commented "Nobody has Proven anything about who gassed whom" during a recent interview on Kennedy Watch. He also mentions the 2013 gas attack which was initially blamed on Syria and was later refuted by A UN report implicating the Syrian Rebels. These are my two main points that make me wonder what the true reason is for sending Tomahawk missiles to Syria.

Additionally, Trump has made some past Twitter comments concerning the Syria situation during the 2013 gas attack that makes me wonder why this is happening. This action is a complete 180 compared to his tweets. Here is an example:

What will we get for bombing Syria besides more debt and a possible long term conflict? Obama needs Congressional approval.

Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 29, 2013

Additional tweets were compiled in The Time article 18 Times Donald Trump Said the U.S. Shouldn't Bomb Syria. 

I would urge you to read them.

Is is possible Spicer had a Freudian slip today?

If Trump's plan is to destabilize the region what would make Trump do actions opposite of his past tweets? Why were we so quick to action when our country was wrong in 2013? What if it turns out we are wrong again? While not a technical war; Why didn't Trump get Congressional approval as a symbolic gesture of Constitutional goodwill?