his wherabouts during the Madeleine Mccann abduction.
It at least deserves looking at. If you don't agree with an honest look-see into a potential paedo ring (once again-i have no smoking gun proof) -then you my friend are one sick individual...
The emails aren't evidence of anything. Magic decoder rings from 4chan don't make those emails evidence after you change the words. Yeesh.
Okay we've got a resemblance which on it's own is evidence of nothing.
Artwork? Really? Not evidence and not worthy of investigation.
Okay so where was he? The only account of him being in Portugal that day seems to come from a secret source inside the FBI.
I will agree #2 deserves looking in to since all tips for such a heinous crime should be looked into. Also keep in mind there are millions of white men that could resemble those pictures.
the emails ---check
the striking resemblance to the FBI images ----double check
the grotesque artwork he indulges in ----will be considered too circumstantial and warrantless.
his wherabouts during the Madeleine Mccann abduction. ----good question, but unsure if the case is closed, can be reopened...etc.
The death of Monica Petersen.
The death of Andrew Breitbart.
Planned Parenthood okaying child sex traffickers for abortions for girls as young as 13.
10,000 missing refugee kids (at least).
How about those?
What reason is there to connect any of those to Podesta and HRC and the wikileaks emails?
Let's try and stick to a coherent story here. I'm pointing out that the current accusations being made based on the wikileaks emails are unfounded and you've replied by making more unfounded accusations without justify the first.
Are you able to show anything in those emails is linked to other things without invoking the 4chan decoder?
@contentjunkie...there is no reason i can think of on what she is giving. Though all of it seems to add up to give us a story, it is something we cannot prove. Which means that if we are TOO emphatic about getting to the "truth" but are unwilling to recognize we could be completely wrong (about a .5% chance but still a chance) ....and at that point we can be attacked for folding to "fake news". Then the powers that be can attack "fake news" and have more reason to censor grassroots media ---citing this case.
We have to be EQUALLY interested in disproving this as we are in proving it if we want to do justice to this case.
It at least deserves looking at. If you don't agree with an honest look-see into a potential paedo ring (once again-i have no smoking gun proof) -then you my friend are one sick individual...
The emails aren't evidence of anything. Magic decoder rings from 4chan don't make those emails evidence after you change the words. Yeesh.
Okay we've got a resemblance which on it's own is evidence of nothing.
Artwork? Really? Not evidence and not worthy of investigation.
Okay so where was he? The only account of him being in Portugal that day seems to come from a secret source inside the FBI.
I will agree #2 deserves looking in to since all tips for such a heinous crime should be looked into. Also keep in mind there are millions of white men that could resemble those pictures.
the emails ---check
the striking resemblance to the FBI images ----double check
the grotesque artwork he indulges in ----will be considered too circumstantial and warrantless.
his wherabouts during the Madeleine Mccann abduction. ----good question, but unsure if the case is closed, can be reopened...etc.
The death of Monica Petersen.
The death of Andrew Breitbart.
Planned Parenthood okaying child sex traffickers for abortions for girls as young as 13.
10,000 missing refugee kids (at least).
How about those?
What reason is there to connect any of those to Podesta and HRC and the wikileaks emails?
Let's try and stick to a coherent story here. I'm pointing out that the current accusations being made based on the wikileaks emails are unfounded and you've replied by making more unfounded accusations without justify the first.
Are you able to show anything in those emails is linked to other things without invoking the 4chan decoder?
http://truthfeed.com/breaking-clinton-foundation-tied-to-convicted-child-trafficker-laura-silsby-media-silent/34146/ is a good start...this is the sweet laura silsby who seems to have gotten into trouble trying ot traffick 33 haitian children. The clintons came to her rescue apparently with the help of their "foundation".
@contentjunkie...there is no reason i can think of on what she is giving. Though all of it seems to add up to give us a story, it is something we cannot prove. Which means that if we are TOO emphatic about getting to the "truth" but are unwilling to recognize we could be completely wrong (about a .5% chance but still a chance) ....and at that point we can be attacked for folding to "fake news". Then the powers that be can attack "fake news" and have more reason to censor grassroots media ---citing this case.
We have to be EQUALLY interested in disproving this as we are in proving it if we want to do justice to this case.