You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Seven Hooligans Arrested For Blocking Immigration Deportations.
I am your first and only view, and arguing patriotism, with a moniker of "THE voice of reason" is very LAUGHABLE, considering this country was "founded" by ALIENS (no laws against them) and was surrendered to them by people who didn't own anything but claimed it as their own anyway, after of course they founded the war which they lost but it indebted the new nation and after it was renamed from the Virginia Company, to the UNITED STATES Company it all of a sudden became much more legitimate... LAUGHABLE.
The US is a corporation founded and funded by elite bankers; a fact most Americans should know, but what YOU don't know is that the Elites FAVOR open borders for the sole purpose of destroying a nation's sovereignty; look what's happening in Europe; same situation that's being played in America, but Trump is putting a stop to it. It's a slow, gradual process, but it's a step in the right direction so if anything's LAUGHABLE about this debate, it's YOU.
a nation that is RUN and RULED by bankers, and who is OWNED by bankers= a country in the making, because somehow starting with a SHITTY ASS CUT OF MEAT you will end up with some decent stake with enough "slow gradual steps in the right direction". LAUGHABLE BRO, go reexamine what you are saying, THEvoiceofcomedy.
THEvoiceofcomedy.
Clever. Too bad you're not clever enough; in fact, you're shallow.
Really funny because governament is arbitrary mandates just like your arbitrary "steps in the right direction", as if that means ANYTHING, such as "not clever enough". Either I am clever, or not, because "right direction" is a thought out statement, kinda like "clever, but not clever enough", entertainment comes from me to me and you to me, not form me to you, mr. Right Direction, very THE but not so much reason.
What's funny is that you have no concept of arbitrary mandates; let alone understand it. Try brushing up on how to debate politics rather than spew out vague notions of what constitutes arbitrary.
-nesting limit-
How can one have no concept of arbitrary mandates and then say I have vauge notions on what constitutes arbitrary, I either have a concept of arbitrary mandates or I do not, yet you are saying I have some concept of the former but not of the former and later combined... Impeccable logic on your part, yet again, and how is "right direction" NOT arbitrary you ignoramus?
-nesting limit-
What's funny is that you cannot even hold ONE argument and think that by challenging my use of arbitrary without providing any evidence to the contrary can substitute for an intelligent coherent argument while missing the obviousness of your baffonery you ignoramus: Your right way is not "THE" right way and you seek to argue it as such, just like govermanemt is full of arbitrary mandates
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbitrary
b : based on or determined by individual preference or convenience rather than by necessity or the intrinsic nature of something
The intrinsic nature of Democracy, AKA Mob Rule (the great hypocrite TJ) and the Electoral College, arbitrary completely, how else can someone vote on issues that they have no rearing in and least act as delegates on issues they have no rearing in you buffoon, besides ARBITRARY.
-nesting limit-
Don't worry, I am sure you haven't had enough so please do type (not spew) your laughable logic some more.
The Marriage Act certainly employed arbitrary and draconian means. It forced all couples to marry between 8 am and 12 noon, according to the rites of the established Church of England, in one of their respective local parish churches. —David Johnson, History Today, November 2003
Hmmm, probably just a hickup on the internet is how you will explain that the context is exactly the same as here. You BUFFOON, don't stop being hilariously sure in your own gaping "right way".
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/arbitrary
The consciousness of humanity says national identity/patriotism and borders are not arbitrary and they are there because of all the freedom others have fought to give us. That sums you up completely as a person. Proof of ignoramus is in your contradicting philosophy: Consciousness of humanity and National Security. I will go ahead now and put you on my shit list and exhale you to asshole status based on the idiocy of what I had stumbled onto, nothing takes the cake than posting this over and over again on all your posts from now on: "Proof of ignoramus is in your contradicting philosophy: Consciousness of humanity and National Security" with a link to my first comment in your article, unless you figure out exactly how to stop this. (starts slow clap for myself for ousting another arrogant asshole who's into giving me grammar lesson, or what words mean and what concepts are incorrectly used without proof.
AHAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH