Sort:  

If your going to fork a chain, the new chain should have all the assets of the original. Period. This is collectivist bullshit. Also, Hive is the worst name, ever.

Is there a law which imposes all that? Here was me thinking that the MIT license allows edits. In fact, it even promotes them.

But to each their own I guess. Next time tho, make sure you at least know the meaning of terms. Censorship is a whole different thing. But... nice try.

Call it what you want, picking and choosing who gets the new shitcoins is clearly a bad way to start a censorship free, decentralized chain. It`s ridiculous. I will have no part of it, except selling everything.

I generally agree and brought this up, but with the proposal system allowing appeals, anyone who wants to, can. They couldn't individually and personally get to know everyone and act accordingly, so it was a systematic choice to be unbiased and sweeping based on whatever requirements.

Whether individuals should be excluded is up to the eye of the beholder, but I think with the appeal system, no problem. Everyone can get their airdrop if they were not maliciously forcing the Justin Sun initiative

Cool story, bro.

There should not be any need for this so-called "airdrop."

Everything that someone doesn't like they call censorship. 😄

Ti si najnizi oblik ulizice koji sam video u zivotu.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.16
JST 0.032
BTC 64196.23
ETH 2757.67
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.71