If your going to fork a chain, the new chain should have all the assets of the original. Period. This is collectivist bullshit. Also, Hive is the worst name, ever.
Is there a law which imposes all that? Here was me thinking that the MIT license allows edits. In fact, it even promotes them.
But to each their own I guess. Next time tho, make sure you at least know the meaning of terms. Censorship is a whole different thing. But... nice try.
Call it what you want, picking and choosing who gets the new shitcoins is clearly a bad way to start a censorship free, decentralized chain. It`s ridiculous. I will have no part of it, except selling everything.
I generally agree and brought this up, but with the proposal system allowing appeals, anyone who wants to, can. They couldn't individually and personally get to know everyone and act accordingly, so it was a systematic choice to be unbiased and sweeping based on whatever requirements.
Whether individuals should be excluded is up to the eye of the beholder, but I think with the appeal system, no problem. Everyone can get their airdrop if they were not maliciously forcing the Justin Sun initiative
Just thought you might have some more insight. I had heard something about this, now I can see the accounts, but I`m still not sure exactly why they will be blocked.
Ok fine, I'll bite. Hive is a new blockchain. It is not steem, but a new thing.
Any group of people have the freedom to gather together and make a fork of Steem. Moreover, these group of people have the freedom to make changes in the blockchain, and they select to exclude certain accounts from their new blockchain.
Is it censorship? Maybe? If you don't like it, you have the freedom not to join this new chain.
They won't be blocked, they just won't participate in the airdrop. Why? Because if they would, that would instantly recreate the unequal dynamics that got us here in the first place on the new chain.
Share your steem/hive with me if you are going to dump it @chadmichaellibby. Maybe this is sort of a game for you guys, but I'm using steem as a job to get money to live like a lot of people in countries with hard economic problems.
How does exclusion from airdrop constitute censorship? They are welcome, they can post, they just don't get any free tokens.
If your going to fork a chain, the new chain should have all the assets of the original. Period. This is collectivist bullshit. Also, Hive is the worst name, ever.
Is there a law which imposes all that? Here was me thinking that the MIT license allows edits. In fact, it even promotes them.
But to each their own I guess. Next time tho, make sure you at least know the meaning of terms. Censorship is a whole different thing. But... nice try.
Call it what you want, picking and choosing who gets the new shitcoins is clearly a bad way to start a censorship free, decentralized chain. It`s ridiculous. I will have no part of it, except selling everything.
I generally agree and brought this up, but with the proposal system allowing appeals, anyone who wants to, can. They couldn't individually and personally get to know everyone and act accordingly, so it was a systematic choice to be unbiased and sweeping based on whatever requirements.
Whether individuals should be excluded is up to the eye of the beholder, but I think with the appeal system, no problem. Everyone can get their airdrop if they were not maliciously forcing the Justin Sun initiative
Cool story, bro.
There should not be any need for this so-called "airdrop."
Everything that someone doesn't like they call censorship. 😄
Ti si najnizi oblik ulizice koji sam video u zivotu.
Why are you asking me? I'm just reporting it. I had no say in any of this.
Just thought you might have some more insight. I had heard something about this, now I can see the accounts, but I`m still not sure exactly why they will be blocked.
Ok fine, I'll bite. Hive is a new blockchain. It is not steem, but a new thing.
Any group of people have the freedom to gather together and make a fork of Steem. Moreover, these group of people have the freedom to make changes in the blockchain, and they select to exclude certain accounts from their new blockchain.
Is it censorship? Maybe? If you don't like it, you have the freedom not to join this new chain.
Yea, I already knew all that. I`m sorry that my question annoys you. I will un-follow you to avoid any more uncomfortable situations with you. MMkaay?
Fuck off dumbass.
'laughing'...
Wow, thanks for wrecking my reputation. You must feel really good about yourself, picking on the little guy.
hahahahaha! To the point 😂 Love it 👍
Ok then, wow
They won't be blocked, they just won't participate in the airdrop. Why? Because if they would, that would instantly recreate the unequal dynamics that got us here in the first place on the new chain.
For the record, because of this, I will not be using HIVE or STEEMIT, once the dust settles.
Share your steem/hive with me if you are going to dump it @chadmichaellibby. Maybe this is sort of a game for you guys, but I'm using steem as a job to get money to live like a lot of people in countries with hard economic problems.
Why the fuck would I do that? I`m going to sell it and buy ADA
Thanks for a reasonable answer.