The charismatic megafauna such as tigers, elephants, lions, pandas and more could go extinct because they are so widely used in media and pop culture!

in #nature6 years ago

We all know exactly what a giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) looks like, but how many of us have actually seen one with our own eyes? I surely haven’t, and I bet most of you are in the same boat as me. Yet I am extremely familiar with this animal, and much of it has to do with how it is represented in the media and in pop culture.


Image is Public Domain.

What do I mean by media and pop culture? I’m thinking about TV series, movies, documentaries, cute drawing of pandas on t-shirts and other wearables, and pretty much every time you see either a photo or digital art of a panda. Due to these sources we all know what the giant panda looks like, but have you ever stopped to consider how this affect the problems of the real giant panda?

There have not been many studies done about this topic in the past, but an international team of researchers from Oregon State University has been doing studies to try to figure out the degree of difference between what people think of these charismatic animals versus how their survival chances actually are. But before they could to this they needed to figure out which animals were the most charismatic!

The top 10 global charismatic animals

A charismatic animal or charismatic megafauna is a term often used in the field of conservation biology, and refers to animals with a widespread appeal to most people. These are often used as mascots for conservation efforts, like how the giant panda became a symbol of the WWF. The point of having one of these animals is that it is easier to sell “conserving 100km2 to save the elephants” than “save 100km2 of African bushlands” to the general public, since people like big, cute animals.

african_elephant by Bernard DUPONT.jpg

Image by Bernard DUPONT, posted with the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license.

But back to the research. The scientists had to figure out which animals were actually the most charismatic animals, and ended up with a survey that asked over 4,500 people in 69 different countries. This gave them a pretty good idea, and the list of the top ten charismatic animals is:

  1. Tiger (Panthera tigris)
  2. Lion (Panthera leo)
  3. Elephant (Loxodonta africana, L. cyclotis, and Elephas maximus)
  4. Giraffe (Giraffa camelopardalis)
  5. Leopard (Panthera pardus)
  6. Panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca)
  7. Cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus)
  8. Polar bear (Ursus maritimus)
  9. Gray wolf (Canis lupus)
  10. Gorilla (Gorilla beringei and G. gorilla)


Tiger - the most charismatic megafuna. Image by Raul654, posted with the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license.

As you can see from the list, the tiger is the most “charismatic”, but I would think that all ten of them are well-known to the general public.

Before we continue, please answer the following: How many of these do you think are considered to be facing a high risk of extinction by the IUCN Red List (either as Vulnerable, Endangered, or Critically Endangered)?

How healthy are these ten animals?

As you might have guessed, the scientists also asked the same question I did above, and most people did not score so well. About 50 % of the people asked did not know that gorillas, cheetahs, leopards, giraffes and lions are endangered!

The elephants did a bit "better", but 35 % still believed that they were not in any danger. But I would say that 65 % of people knowing that they are facing extinction is pretty good, but there's still room for improvement.

Both pandas, tigers and polar bears did a lot better though, and only roughly 15 – 20 % did not know that they are faced by the threat of extinction. This could mean that the conservation programs for these species have been working as planned, so does this mean that only 3 out of 9 of the most charismatic species’ awareness efforts are good enough?

incorrect-answer-percent.PNG

See how many who got the wrong answer about each species' endangerment status. Graph by © 2018 Courchamp et al., posted with CC BY 4.0.

Anyway, what number did you guess? The correct answer is that nine of these species are facing the threat of extinction, and only the grey wolf is doing fine. Despite the wolf not being in any immediate threat of extinction, it has lost a huge amount of habitat in the last century, and it might not be all that safe in the long-term.

As you can see, there is a huge gap between how people perceive these animals to be doing, and how they actually are doing. There are most likely several factors that affect this, but the researchers who wrote the paper has hypothesized that the major issue is the presence of a virtual population!

A “virtual population” could explain the degree of difference

The scientists behind the research paper believes that the reason why people are so unaware of the situation of these animals is because of their wide use in pop culture, commercials, on clothing, and stuff like that. This creates a “virtual population” of these animals, and people get bias to think that they are more of these animals than there really are.

As of right now, any company or organizations can freely use cartoons of tigers, polar bears or any other animal, and if you see the TV commercials later tonight, then you will surely see a few of the animals that are found on the list above.

They further believes that people are thinking along the lines of “these animals will never disappear, because everyone is aware of them”, again due to the huge virtual population that inflates their real numbers.

If that’s not enough, the research also points towards more public use of the animals leading to their downfall, since people are less inclined to donate to conservation efforts after getting their bias from seeing the virtual population. In order words, some of these might be going extinct because we use them so frequently in the entertainment industry!


I bet that you have seen this lion hundreds of times in your life!

How can we change this?

There is obviously no quick fix for this problem, so it’s up to us as a society to find good solutions to the problem. I believe raising real awareness is a good step, but some might think that we should go further and even ban the use of endangered animals for purely entertainment purposes. Or maybe make laws that require the use of them to also mention to real status of them? I honestly don’t know how to solve it, but it’s quite clear that we need to do something if we still want to have the animals outside of the virtual population that has been created.

Lacoste has already been doing their part. As you might know they have a crocodile as their logo, but recently partnered up with IUCN and changed the logo to 10 different endangered species. This is a great way to raise awareness of these species, but sadly this campaign was very limited.


The original Lacoste logo is seen in the window. Image © Yann Forget / Wikimedia Commons / CC-BY-SA-3.0.

Thanks for reading

Thanks for checking out my post! I hope you found it interesting, and perhaps even learned more about how threatened some of these species are? If so, then at least I have done a small part to educate about the issue.

I definitely recommend reading the original scientific article called The paradoxical extinction of the most charismatic animals by Courchamp F, Jaric I, Albert C, Meinard Y, Ripple WJ, Chapron G (2018). It’s published under the Creative Commons license, so it’s free to read, and even adapt and reuse.

About @valth

Hey, I'm @valth - the author of this post. I love to write about nature, biology, animals, nature conservation, ecology and other related branches of science, and I occasionally write about my life, about Steem or about random stuff as well. I'm trying my best to write at least one post every day, so make sure to give me a follow if you enjoy my content and want to see more of it.

Join the @valth community!

I love nothing more than to engage with my readers, so please join the @valth community in the comment section. You will definitely find more information about the topic, personal experiences, questions, and even opposing views down there, so don't miss out on learning more.

I always reward users who post good comments, so please take the opportunity to share your views and get a small upvote in exchange for it.

Want to read more science posts on the Steem blockchain? Check out #SteemSTEM!

Sort:  

Hi @Valth
I actually read in a since magazine for some months ago a crazy suggestion.
That if we actually scarified the panda so it would go to extinction we could save a lot of other animals on the red list.
They concluded with this because every one wanted to save the panda because it was a cute animal so they get a lot of money in different care programs. And this money could be used to save a lot of species that dont get money at all because of the panda.

I dont say I agree with this, but it is a thought since we need to take care of the animals that are going extinct because they are not "good looking" as the panda are.

Hey @gyldenhorn.

That's a pretty drastic suggestion, but I see the point of it. The problem is that the charismatic species are needed to get people to donate. No one wants to donate to save plants, insects, and non-cute animals, so I'm afraid that conservation groups would just get a lot less money if we sacrificed the panda.

So maybe the solution would be to let people think that they donated to save the panda, but rather spend the money on other species? It's a tough call to make though.

I was one of those who knew that giraffes, tigers and lions are in danger of extinction. OMG, NOOO. These animals are the most "symbolic" of the animal kingdom :( I'm afraid that if we lose them, then a snowball effect will begin in which we could lose many more species

Yeah, it will definitely be a big snowball effect for many of these, since species such as lions and tigers are apex predators that are needed to control the prey population. It obviously depends a bit on how fast they go extinct, but it will surely lead to problems for other species.

The fact that we see them all the time never occurred to me as reinforcing the belief that they are all thriving species. I was shocked to read 9 out of the 10 are endangered.

It has more with us being used to seeing the animals, not necessarily that we are tricked into believing that there are many of them alive. And at one point we are just so used to them that we can't even grasp how there can be so few left. But it's pretty crazy that all except the wolf is endangered - most people have no idea!

You are right @vault, if something is not done we might just live in a world without the megafunas, coincidentally I did an article on the Panthera leo spelaea, this is an extinct subspecies of the lion, not mentioning the Panthera fossilis and the Panthera atrox(other extinct subspecies), many threats on these animals have led to this road and I think letting the public know about them and some laws enacted to conserve them might just be the key to saving them all.

Oh, that looks like a great post about the Panthera leo spelaea! I'm definitely going to be saving that to read later, because I don't have time right now.

"Virtual population" - this name give me clear understanding why the advertising system does not help animals.
I thought before, that advertising will rise up the awareness, but it should be done more for this, than just put a photo or picture on the t-shirt.
Thanks a lot, @valth, you rised up my awareness once more.

I suppose seeing the animals in pop culture and advertisements could help if they also included some info about the real status of the animals though.

Anyway, thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment :D

Humans have a habits of seeing is believing. In simple words human miss only those things which they don't see in real life, After seeing so much animal in entertainment industry and shirts one become unaware of the real scenario of these beautiful animal. Problems need to be addressed in a comprehensive manner by launching an awareness campaign at all level and telling the real info to the commoners.
One way of providing a real info is by using a pic of animal with a little message like save lion. They are endanger specie. Just like we have caution mark in cigarette box. Thanks for pointing out our attention towards this important matter. keep sharing @valth

I completely agree with that, @kamchore :) I like the analogy with the caution mark on the cigarette box! We should definitely have something like that for endangered animals as well.

Yes it will definitely help to develop more awareness. Majority of humans love animal. Let's hope for the best @valth

Thanks for this great post @Valth. Mankind is driving a lot of species to extinction and its not too late for us to change this. The time to act is now and @thegreens, @dukefranky @martin.mikes and others are doing some great work to protect species and the environment. Check @thegreens to learn more and we are glad to connect

I'll make sure yo check out @thegreeens later when I have some spare time :) But you're right: we need to act now. It would have been better if we had already acted in the past, but that's too late, so now is the time to do it.

We are taking some environmental actions you may want to see. Check out our Earth day plan of action https://steemit.com/earthday/@thegreens/did-you-know-earth-day-is-on-sunday-april-22-endplasticpollution#comments

Really alarming...The virtual population effect is indeed serious...
Lets hope that the awareness programs bear some fruit in future and the common perception breaks.

Yep, let's cross our fingers for that :)

Hello friend I support you with your content you are very right they only think about their own benefit and do not take into account the consequences or the state of these beautiful animals. They are unable to contribute something for their benefit is sad but real, I congratulate you great post.Greetings tine my support.

Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment. It's very sad that these animals are "exploited" by pop culture without getting something in return indeed.

True, the human being uses the image of these animals for their benefit and sell more, but in reality they do not care if these animals are well, I had seen the initiative of lacoste and it seemed incredible because it included all these species, it hurts that it was only for a limited time.

Yep, the animals are just used to sell more without any effort being done to conserve them in real life.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.20
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63706.08
ETH 2615.50
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.82