What is a webbot hit?
Age is a tough thing to guestimate. With the ice age in mind, it would be around 15,000 years old. But considering the sidement, possibly more.
What are your thoughts?
Webbot from @clif , Clif High: I think his August report suggested something like this.
How deep is this? The underwater stone structures in other places - clearly not crashed UFOs - suggest that the sea level was a lot lower in the past. But stone structures don't leave impact scars.
I think it is at a depth of 90m. I originally found this on youtube when it was first discovered - I didn't think much of it until I saw the sonar scan some months later.
The sea was carved out by receding ice during the ice ages. The ice can actually take a rock, move it and then drop it off as it melts; so it is actually possible that the drag marks are made by the "structure" (I don't know what to call it), depending on the surface of the sea floor. However, it is not possible in this case, due to the heat created, as well as the fact that it would have filled itself in over time (because if this was caused by ice, it would take hundreds of years to drag it this far, giving the sand planty of time to fill the drag marks).
But you are dead right, there is evidence for civilisations that have now been swallowed by the sea along the coasts.
Crashed UFO? I really don't know... but I have very little explaination of what it could be. It is a unique anomaly, whether it is a UFO, a rock moved by ice, a structure left by a lost civilisation or even just a submarine trap. Until we actually have a sample of the object and analyse it, it is difficult to say.
Got to wonder why the military is involved though... and from what I have read, it is not just one, but many
What is a webbot hit?
Age is a tough thing to guestimate. With the ice age in mind, it would be around 15,000 years old. But considering the sidement, possibly more.
What are your thoughts?
Webbot from @clif , Clif High: I think his August report suggested something like this.
How deep is this? The underwater stone structures in other places - clearly not crashed UFOs - suggest that the sea level was a lot lower in the past. But stone structures don't leave impact scars.
I think it is at a depth of 90m. I originally found this on youtube when it was first discovered - I didn't think much of it until I saw the sonar scan some months later.
The sea was carved out by receding ice during the ice ages. The ice can actually take a rock, move it and then drop it off as it melts; so it is actually possible that the drag marks are made by the "structure" (I don't know what to call it), depending on the surface of the sea floor. However, it is not possible in this case, due to the heat created, as well as the fact that it would have filled itself in over time (because if this was caused by ice, it would take hundreds of years to drag it this far, giving the sand planty of time to fill the drag marks).
But you are dead right, there is evidence for civilisations that have now been swallowed by the sea along the coasts.
Crashed UFO? I really don't know... but I have very little explaination of what it could be. It is a unique anomaly, whether it is a UFO, a rock moved by ice, a structure left by a lost civilisation or even just a submarine trap. Until we actually have a sample of the object and analyse it, it is difficult to say.
Got to wonder why the military is involved though... and from what I have read, it is not just one, but many