Could this be an ancient UFO on the bottom of the Baltic Sea?
Could this be an ancient UFO on the bottom of the Baltic Sea?
I recently write a small piece on the mysterious Baltic Sea Anomaly (link at the bottom of the page), something which has had my attention since the beginning. Basically, it would appear that a craft of some description crashed into the sea, leaving a scorched trench in its wake.
However, I failed to mention that there is a smaller second object which was found next to the innitial anomaly.
The theory goes that this is possibly a piece of the larger anomaly which broke off during the impact. Unfortunetly, there is very little information on this smaller piece of debris.
From the start, this opperation has been plagued with porblems. For unknown reasons, most of the equiptmet on board the ship began to fail as they were above this object, which made documenting it extremely tough and basic. Divers did manage to visit the wreck, however it is not easy to find the footage they took. There are a handful of pictures:
Interestingly, there is a hole in the object:
This one appears to be some kind of raised streamlining
I don't even know what to make of this one:
It is hard to have an opinion of what this could be with such a lack of footage. It is understandable - the waters are very dark and visability is poor. To add to that, there is a thick layer of sediment that makes it difficult to see the object itself.
Another issue that makes this a tough project is funding - it is not cheap for people just to head out to sea and undertake this task. The Ocean X team had appealed for funding, although it is not evident that they recieved any. They did, however, get the Swedish military involved, which is no doubt a main reason for the fact that we are no longer getting any information on the topic.
Here is a short Documentary on the Baltic Sea Anomaly:
Is this a Webbot hit? Or something older?
What is a webbot hit?
Age is a tough thing to guestimate. With the ice age in mind, it would be around 15,000 years old. But considering the sidement, possibly more.
What are your thoughts?
Webbot from @clif , Clif High: I think his August report suggested something like this.
How deep is this? The underwater stone structures in other places - clearly not crashed UFOs - suggest that the sea level was a lot lower in the past. But stone structures don't leave impact scars.
I think it is at a depth of 90m. I originally found this on youtube when it was first discovered - I didn't think much of it until I saw the sonar scan some months later.
The sea was carved out by receding ice during the ice ages. The ice can actually take a rock, move it and then drop it off as it melts; so it is actually possible that the drag marks are made by the "structure" (I don't know what to call it), depending on the surface of the sea floor. However, it is not possible in this case, due to the heat created, as well as the fact that it would have filled itself in over time (because if this was caused by ice, it would take hundreds of years to drag it this far, giving the sand planty of time to fill the drag marks).
But you are dead right, there is evidence for civilisations that have now been swallowed by the sea along the coasts.
Crashed UFO? I really don't know... but I have very little explaination of what it could be. It is a unique anomaly, whether it is a UFO, a rock moved by ice, a structure left by a lost civilisation or even just a submarine trap. Until we actually have a sample of the object and analyse it, it is difficult to say.
Got to wonder why the military is involved though... and from what I have read, it is not just one, but many