Rightly said, instead of genocide, proper allocation of our earth resources is necessary. This will not only ensure that the resources are available where there is an actual need but would also prevent wastage where they are in excess than the demand.
Also people should educated to use resources allocated to them in more efficient manner. If we are able to reduce the wastages of food or energy and even fuel that happen all around the world, it would greatly increase the global economy to a certain extent.
Being able to do all that would be much better than genocide @sankysanket18. The trick becomes, how to do it, who decides, and who makes it happen? Too many people with too many vested interests and too many fingers in the pie to be able to do this on an honor system where everyone just buys in and decides to do it.
It would be nice if countries could just figure it out without too much pain or complaining, let alone shooting for the entire world all at once. Even that's going to be hard.
My guess is, a smaller group, say a city or a small district of some kind is going to need to lead out, and then make some noise about it. And even then, you're still going to have your profiteers who will not go unless they can jump to something else and makes as much or more.
I just have issues when people seem to want to get rid of other people. We've found a World War over that, and other wars. And too many genocides have happened as it is. There just isn't any Thanos kind of scenario where the ends justify the means. If in no other way, we're definitely in this particular situation (experiencing population growth while maintaining and sustaining resources) together.
View this answer on Musing.io
Rightly said, instead of genocide, proper allocation of our earth resources is necessary. This will not only ensure that the resources are available where there is an actual need but would also prevent wastage where they are in excess than the demand.
Also people should educated to use resources allocated to them in more efficient manner. If we are able to reduce the wastages of food or energy and even fuel that happen all around the world, it would greatly increase the global economy to a certain extent.
Being able to do all that would be much better than genocide @sankysanket18. The trick becomes, how to do it, who decides, and who makes it happen? Too many people with too many vested interests and too many fingers in the pie to be able to do this on an honor system where everyone just buys in and decides to do it.
It would be nice if countries could just figure it out without too much pain or complaining, let alone shooting for the entire world all at once. Even that's going to be hard.
My guess is, a smaller group, say a city or a small district of some kind is going to need to lead out, and then make some noise about it. And even then, you're still going to have your profiteers who will not go unless they can jump to something else and makes as much or more.
I just have issues when people seem to want to get rid of other people. We've found a World War over that, and other wars. And too many genocides have happened as it is. There just isn't any Thanos kind of scenario where the ends justify the means. If in no other way, we're definitely in this particular situation (experiencing population growth while maintaining and sustaining resources) together.
View this answer on Musing.io
woo , thanks :))
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io
View this answer on Musing.io