I believe current scientific proof can aid in this suits. But has there been a question like this in the past to ensure that the research as to whether glyphosate is a carcinogen is ongoing? . I'm saying this because if the research on answering this question was started recently just because of this case, it might take time to get the accurate answer and we have poor victims with their claims not being attended to.

It's a pity that science aids us in one way and tends to harm us in another.