Thanks for the reply, Jeff. I guess I should give you some more attention and re-engage in how you're coming to your conclusions and what passes for "worked out" here. I hope you understand, I mean no disrespect, but humans often (far too often, IMO) find patterns and meaning in data, even when none exists. This is provable so. Coming up with causation from correlation regarding date-based historical records is a well-documented example of this common fallacy.

That said, even if there is no causation, if enough people believe there is, there will be. :)