RE: Huntington Ingalls Inc. (HII) Analysis
Look, you wrote that @haejin votes for herself, which means she behaves immorally. But, your friend @moeknows also vote for myself in full force. I do not understand what you are defending. The question is not money, but in their quantity?))) If the system allows you to give voice to yourself, this is normal. Disable this feature and everything will return to normal. Still, @moeknows himself admits that he was the first to throw a stone in the direction of @haejin, why do all the barrels in this case roll on @haejin?
Regarding the votes, what I was saying about the voices for the newcomers from the minnows was an open discussion of the same minnows who are concerned about this issue. I just gave a simple and clear example. I will survive without your votes. Continue to fight. I left Facebook, due to the fact that that atmosphere of abuse had bothered, now Steemit smells the same.
I have been upvoting myself more lately because I can say with certainty that it will not pay out. As he does with many other minnows, haejin flags my posts and comments. The difference between him and me is that I would never flag someone for simply disagreeing with my rewards. It is childish.
You are mistaken. I never said that. In fact, haejin downvoted me twice months before I ever downvoted him and for much more money. I even upvoted him afterwards long before I ever threw any flags.
You wrote that you associate yourself with a concrete mixer driver who ruined the wall of my house))) How was I supposed to understand this? I do not believe that there is no compromise in this matter. Drink a cup of coffee for Skype and find the common denominator. I do not blame you for voting. You have the right to do what you think is right. Another thing is that one is condemned for this, and the other is forgotten.
All post payouts are the result of votes. All people are free to choose how they vote. They are also free to express opinions on how they believe is the right way to vote. My main point in this conversation is to point out that he is not a condemned victim, but a willing belligerent. His own actions escalate and perpetuate the situation more.
I can only guess, but, in view of the fact that Steemit is multinational, many different cultures, one can not guess the consequences of those or other actions. In different cultures, they relate different ways to insult and damage. High-spirited words you do not exactly solve the situation, only dialogue. In any case, there is an end in everything, define it.