RE: The last missing piece of the steem puzzle
Hello, @snowflake. :) I find your post very interesting. I joined steemit in June 2016 but became active only few month ago. The problem with moderation seems complex to me.
Censorship is definitely an issue. I am a third gender individual assigned female at birth, I am an agnostic and practising occultist, a left-leaning anarchist from a non-English speaking country. In addition, I live in a different country to the one I was born in. It's hard for me to find a common ground with others most of the time. :D
I am hesitant to blog about politics because I know that my views are generally not popular. Nothing I said ever got flagged, but most of my comments on the political subjects were ignored. This discouraged me from becoming more vocal. I refrain from expressing my point of view fearing the negative response. Why sweat at the keyboard writing about politics when I can get rewards from posting about making jam! :D
I do flag people posting inflammatory comments and ones begging for votes, but I do pay notice to how powerful the person is on the platform. Part of me thinks, I should act like a whale and not care. The other side of me thinks 'why harm my chances?'
If there was a downvote consensus like you propose, perhaps I would feel less vulnerable expressing myself. That said, like @timcliff points out, the idea might be hard to implement in a meaningful way.
This is remarkable work.
Thank you for your support in moderating. If it can make you feel better, you're way more likely to have your vote ignored by a whale and in case of unfair flag war, you'll find support from other whales through moderation initiatives. Check out the project @freepeach (not very active, but you get the idea).
... or find that your collectivist whale eventually gets flagged to death! :) e.g. @berniesanders
Thanks for your response. :) It seems that @freepeach doesn't exist. Is there a typo in the name?
https://steemit.com/@freezepeach
Cheers! :)