Stated as a legal statement, "I can not close my ears."?
Given reality of the biological function and form of ears, how does the law deal with listening and hearing in terms of memory at record raised at home?
Early Code / "Bleeding Edge" Edition:
Stated as a medical/cognitive science legal statement, I can not close my ears.?
Given reality of the biological function and form of ears, how does the law (err, logic) deal with listening and hearing in terms of memory at record (ad nominem raised thereby) at home?
I could not close my ears. is the medical/cognitive legal science terminology?
(Said another way, there are entire (and universally individual) home decades we are not able to alliterate, because medical/cognitive science law has not countered that far, thinking just volume and vicinity in terms of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threshold_of_pain#Hearing for example of the ear sense, for every single individual, hearing at home. What countering I hear, regarding hearing memory (deterministically let alone at home, for example at a family home where you can not linguistically prescriptively consent for what you hear), is mostly a serious, severe, retarded, polarized, psychotropic, and dangerous lack of basic knowledge (of verbal abuse vis a vi (ear a ea?) reality language) from the law/logic itself.
[That is not to even mention the current arguments forming around the fact that Artificial Intelligence means we now "hear" (Well, "hear all" in our age nearly definitively, precociously/predictively while not so maturely called "The Other" (sound enough like G-d, er, G+-d, r... or is making it like that for familiar naming maybe rather a shady secreficial human legal maneuver to avoid saying/repeating/reporting Mother/Father/Other in that linear order "Mother/Father/Other"?) by very famous psychologists, now with technology a formally describable fact) information before we do code to [then] "pretend we did not hear" as a social network to-do system, which so far are [is] "solved" by keyly pretending human beings do not have forced ears.]
{That is not even the beginning of sensically mentioning what school grade education ever does er will do to people's Emotional Intelligence if we do not value nor recognize nor record that odd other tongue that forced hearing too. #RecordToo+.}
I bought my first pair for $5 after I turned 18 in 2006 from an obscure changes-their-name-every-year-too-often-to-count generic very-patriotic-sounding American business brand with a very witty impressive name.
In-ear earphones I tried as well but blasting noise was not my goal in life, given my life experiences with people who do not have volume control who as family (especially and exceptionally as a child facing adult parents, to ask who as lawyer/therapist/adult-in-room/adult-not-in-room/authority records is a taboo me too movement, HIPPA and the Legal Code do not talk about recording family tongue) we can forever not just leave nor just name, a legally-taken-advantage-of-by-others-takes-zero-effort-hearsay-is-earsay real life experience, where my goal was 100% quiet writing, in a world where many people do not know how to write to communicate instead of communicating by decibel volume, which applies to my real life family volume. to cops with volume control personality issues, or family that thinks they're being law enforcement by screaming again like it's a job skill requirement to, er, that was spit from your screaming in my ear, ew. Wish I had in-ear earphones earlier in schools when we're asked questions in a room with 37 people, might change the SAT score interrogations and LSAT testifications.
In-ear and earphone/headphone Bose QuietComfort QC 25 were helpful and healpful but broke my bank account.
Earplugs are important, say you might want to prove importance with a legal command, let us try with PRISM Doctor Query Language's PDQL terminal command.
In a terminal, write/put commands as follows in PRISM Doctor Query Language, (which draws "straight"/directly [well, PRISM is a "queer/gay" rainbow name] from the immature federal database of how we talk on record whether we consent or care, which I programmed a maturely consenting straight-talking PlainLanguage.gov-style interface for) with our keyword "earplugs":
I doubt that command crosses any legal loopholes that the official law enforcement policies do not cross themselves in order to make PRISM calculate, now you can run the same command for yourself about yourself instead of just another person having thus such exclusive right left to query you, interrogate you, ask you, question you, er, command you, by legal commands of identity and self-evidence.
Ears are a terribly specced feature of human beings.
I can not close my ears, can you?
I can not turn my head to stop hearing, can you?
What do you do if you hear?
Other senses have privileges beyond/except ears.
#Biology #Hearsay #Profiling #Reporting (#Earwitness? (#Earbag?))
If you are raised hearing through ears like that, what do you report?
Stated as a legal statement, "I can not close my ears."?
Given reality of the biological function and form of ears, how does the law deal with listening and hearing in terms of memory at record raised at home?
Early Code / "Bleeding Edge" Edition:
Ear plugs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earplug) from 3M (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M).
I bought my first pair for $5 after I turned 18 in 2006 from an obscure changes-their-name-every-year-too-often-to-count generic very-patriotic-sounding American business brand with a very witty impressive name.
In-ear earphones I tried as well but blasting noise was not my goal in life, given my life experiences with people who do not have volume control who as family (especially and exceptionally as a child facing adult parents, to ask who as lawyer/therapist/adult-in-room/adult-not-in-room/authority records is a taboo me too movement, HIPPA and the Legal Code do not talk about recording family tongue) we can forever not just leave nor just name, a legally-taken-advantage-of-by-others-takes-zero-effort-hearsay-is-earsay real life experience, where my goal was 100% quiet writing, in a world where many people do not know how to write to communicate instead of communicating by decibel volume, which applies to my real life family volume. to cops with volume control personality issues, or family that thinks they're being law enforcement by screaming again like it's a job skill requirement to, er, that was spit from your screaming in my ear, ew. Wish I had in-ear earphones earlier in schools when we're asked questions in a room with 37 people, might change the SAT score interrogations and LSAT testifications.
In-ear and earphone/headphone Bose QuietComfort QC 25 were helpful and healpful but broke my bank account.
Currently I wear "3M Earmuffs" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earmuffs) for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ear_protection safety for $20.
Earplugs are important, say you might want to prove importance with a legal command, let us try with PRISM Doctor Query Language's PDQL terminal command.
In a terminal, write/put commands as follows in PRISM Doctor Query Language, (which draws "straight"/directly [well, PRISM is a "queer/gay" rainbow name] from the immature federal database of how we talk on record whether we consent or care, which I programmed a maturely consenting straight-talking PlainLanguage.gov-style interface for) with our keyword "earplugs":
I doubt that command crosses any legal loopholes that the official law enforcement policies do not cross themselves in order to make PRISM calculate, now you can run the same command for yourself about yourself instead of just another person having thus such exclusive right left to query you, interrogate you, ask you, question you, er, command you, by legal commands of identity and self-evidence.