You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Explaining the whale-fasting experiment
A downvote was applied to partially counter earlier whale votes as an experiment to reduce whale domination of voting influence. Not intended to express an opinion on the content nor result in a net reduction of rewards or reputation (automated notice)
Maybe you could have waited until later with that, @smooth, since this is an info-video about the @abit experiment to explain it in layman terms :)
easy @smooth you too, no exceptions but hey, a 4 hours delay?
I agree. I had a downvote applied as vote 4 of a post - one of those 3 votes above was more influential than me. The parameters being used to manage the downvoting robots do not seem to be right. I guess it all comes down to maths
well fyrst...you didnt say anything in your video about how shittily this experiment was designed and how really this could have been simulated by knowing the voting stats and the mathematics used for upvotes.
Its easy to see how this experiment is shit maybe now? this video needs changed to express the facts...