see, i knew it. you WANT men to look at you. even your braless post is a subtle hint at that. nothing wrong with that, but just say it. I think all this free the nipple stuff is really an excuse for women to be rebellious and revel in men looking at thier boobs. end of story.
Or maybe she's just in it for the Steem 🤔. I don't think you should discredit an entire movement of women based on one female's actions. That's pretty ignorant.
see, i knew it. you WANT people to look at your posts. even your comments are a subtle hint at that. nothing wrong with that, but just say it. I think all the criticism of the free the nipple stuff is really an excuse for intolerant people to draw and revel in the attention of trolls. end of story.
friend, have you read through her blog and looked at her pics? i think she's been explicitly clear why she's here. first and foremost is to express herself fully and overcome her prior anxiety and the resulting compulsion to hide herself from others. her nudity and sexuality is part of not hiding. i don't expect you to understand that (you couldn't unless you've been through it), but its true. second, like you, she is here to gain attention and earn steem. being authentic and vulnerable, which includes revealing her sexuality, is a good way to do that.
I appreciate your response, sean. I just don't think that flaunting yourself in front of men who are on her blog to induldge their lusts over her (e.g. TAKE more away from her). She doesn't need that to feel good about her self.
Let's continue for a minute. Suppose you are correct as to her motivation. What's wrong with "indulging their lust"? Why do you deem that to be somehow unfair or unwise or shameful? Suppose that instead of being sexy she had great musical talent and displayed it here. Would you criticize her for indulging people's natural affinity for music? Would you tell her that she didn't need to share her music to feel good about herself? Or if she were a gifted artist, would you critisize her for indulging people's artistic fascinations? Or if she were a brilliant poet or essayist (actually, she kinda is the latter), would you criticize her for sharing her writings here? Would you suggest that "she doesn't need to do that to feel good about herself"?
I don't think you would. Why not? Aren't your issues with female beauty, and especially female sexuality and sensuality, purely a function of your religious sensibilities? I challenge you to articulate a nonreligious and nonmoralistic distinction between "indulging lust" and indulging any other human desire (such as for beauty, music, poetry, friendship, recognition, etc.).