Charity May Require Sacrifice, Prosperism Needs No Sacrifice
I've written quite a few blog posts on Charity and a new technology powered socioeconomic system: Prosperism. The traditional understanding of charity keeps coming up whenever I talk about incentivized and equitable sharing, so I thought I explain the difference through this blog, and the one that follows this one.
Charity Vs Prosperism
While charity is a moral socioethical concept, which might carry different meaning to different individuals, Prosperism is a clearly defined scientifically provable decentralized Zero-Loss socioeconomic platform that democratizes wealth generation and distribution based on incentivized and equitable sharing
So, in contrast to Charity, Prosperism is devoid of any moral or ethical obligation and requires no sacrifice on anyone's part and it taxes no one while benefiting every one.
My First Experiment (Giving Incentivized By Receiving) Bears Fruit
As an example, I recently carried out an experiment on sharing my influence with Steemians to help those in need. 24 Steemians participated in the experiment and 24 more have already pledged this week. So far my 48 upvotes have helped 48 needy people across the globe. Neither I sacrificed anything, nor the Steemians who pledged to help did. We all just shared our influence for a good cause.
Weekly Prosperism Exercise To Continue
Incentivized sharing so far seems to have been working, though it definitely requires some tweeking and oversight, which we'll do as we go along. Suggestions are welcome.
Cheers :)
growing step by step every single upvote counts
even if its small we all together will grow a nice Prosperism community xD
Join the plague !!!
Thank @ormus. May be you mean join the revolution (plague is a negative term).
yeah been a plague not need to be negative
we are the light of heaven plague !!
Changing the world while benefiting everyone. Understanding properism more and more each day :)
This post was actually drafted in response to your comment on my previous post on the same subject. If it helped it was worth the effort. Cheers :)
Ah felt like it was. More clarity on the subject every time I read your posts. Thanks! :D
great work friends god bless u😊
I have participated with you for donation and help those who suffer poverty. in a post 7 days ago "Prosperity With Charity Is A Myth: Let's Make It Incentivised & Equitable With Prosperism" on your vote against my comment.
and today I want to participate again in support of your campaign @sharonomics
@aaawee: If you know somebody who needs help, you can participate and receive an SBD reward with your pledge to help. The opportunity is available here: https://steemit.com/life/@sharonomics/weekly-incentivized-sharing-i-wanna-become-a-prosperist-and-help-the-impoverished
You’re doing a good job @sharonomics 😊 continue sharing your influence to others.
Keep it up!
Prosperism is definitely better!!!!! I think since people with really little attitude to contribute to making this world a better place can actually do it by a little upvote or something along those lines without actually having to lose anything!!!
i appreciate to see your valubale job...
thats so good. ..
i realize it so much..
carry in dea r@sharonomics
well I think to help about ones close us is more bette than to make a philanthropy and enlist it first and afterward we require some huge cash for help individuals and first teh lease , charge and different pays for the individuals who work in your philanthropy however opposite side on the off chance that we help somebody which are close us and evey one do this then beyond any doubt we dont require any bulding ,office or the enrollment and your thought is best for help with individuals in entire world your prizes
this arrangement work great,, and this thought spread cash in entire nation bcz each one have a place from contrast countriesa anc urban areas
incredible employment @sharonomics
I think to help somewhere in the range of ones close us is more bette than to make a philanthropy and enlist it first and after that we require some huge cash for help individuals and first teh lease ,
charge and different pays for the individuals who work in your philanthropy however opposite side on the off chance that we help somebody which are close us and evey one do this then beyond any doubt we dont require any bulding ,office or the enrollment and your thought is best for help with individuals in entire world your prizes
this arrangement work great,, and this thought spread cash in entire nation bcz each one have a place from distinction countriesa anc urban communities ....
yaah i agree ! charity help people to develope hope !
while Prosperism where is no loss!
yaah Prosperism is deovide!
as per my openion Prosperism is better because many want no loss but actually loss is the key to do better !
thank you sharonomics for better comunity !
charity provide people shelter !
charity provide people hope
charity provide new life to those who disopointment from life and make succide!